VERY IMPORTANT - All State's Primary rules information. Know if you need to switch to Republican weeks in advance to vote for Ron Paul

It is VERY IMPORTANT people know what their State Primary rules are.

If you are a Democrat right now in some states you will need to have switched parties weeks in advance to be able to vote in the Republican primary.

I am providing a link so you can see what your state primary rules are but the exact information is below.  

Those who are registered Democrats right now may need to switch parties immediately to be able to vote for Ron Paul in the republican primary.

I believe millions of people who were fooled by Obama and all his lies from the last election are going to be voting Ron Paul for his truths!

But they need to know what they have to do ahead of time.

Please get the information out to everyone, especially those in states that need to register weeks ahead of time for one party or another.

This is our country and our freedoms we are standing up for!  This is for our children and this is for our forefathers who formed the country.

I AM DEFENDING AND STANDING UP FOR THOMAS JEFFERSON

I AM DEFENDING AND STANDING UP FOR GEORGE WASHINGTON

I AM DEFENDING AND STANDING UP FOR BEN FRANKLIN
I AM DEFENDING AND STANDING UP FOR ALL WHO SIGNED THEIR NAMES ON OUR BILL OF RIGHTS

I AM DEFENDING AND STANDING UP FOR THE CONSTITUTION

I AM DEFENDING AND STANDING UP FOR FREEDOMS

I AM DEFENDING THE ABOVE AND ALL OTHERS WHO SIGNED THEIR NAMES ON THE CONSTITUTION AND BILL OF RIGHTS!  IT IS OUR TIME TO DEFEND THEM AND TO BE WHO THEY WERE!  THEY STOOD UP TO TYRANNY AT THE RISK OF THEIR LIVES, WE NOW NEED TO DO THE SAME THING AT THE RISK OF OUR FREEDOM!

I put this information in another post of when our forefathers were signing the Declaration of Independence and how they feared for their lives... but were encouraged. This information is from The Secret Teachings of All Ages - it is sacred texts information. The link goes to what are the mysteries of life and what ancient history really was compared to what we are taught. Here is the part about the U.S.

It was during the evening of July 4, 1776, that the second of these mysterious episodes occurred. In the old State House in Philadelphia a group of men were gathered for the momentous task of severing the last tie between the old country and the new. It was a grave moment and not a few of those present feared that their lives would be the forfeit for their audacity. In the midst of the debate a fierce voice rang out. The debaters stopped and turned to look upon the stranger. Who was this man who had suddenly appeared in their midst and transfixed them with his oratory? They had never seen him before, none knew when he had entered, but his tall form and pale face filled them with awe. His voice ringing with a holy zeal, the stranger stirred them to their very souls. His closing words rang through the building: "God has given America to be free!" As the stranger sank into a chair exhausted, a wild enthusiasm burst forth. Name after name was placed upon the parchment: the Declaration of Independence was signed. But where was the man who had precipitated the accomplishment of this immortal task--who had lifted for a moment the veil from the eyes of the assemblage and revealed to them a part at least of the great purpose for which the new nation was conceived? He had disappeared, nor was he ever seen again or his identity established. This episode parallels others of a similar kind recorded by ancient historians attendant upon the founding of every new nation. Are they coincidences, or do they demonstrate that the divine wisdom of the ancient Mysteries still is present in the world, serving mankind as it did of old?

Here are the types of Primaries in the states

Open primary:

Voters of any affiliation may vote for the candidate of whatever party they choose. Some of these open primary states may not have party registration at all; however open primary states do prohibit voters in X primary from going on to participate in Y's primary or runoff. Yet, this prohibition can be difficult to enforce.
The crucial issue in open primary states is "crossover" voting, which can contribute to the victory of a nominee closer to the center or radically further away. It most often involves members of Party Y (either in an area dominated by Party X or when Party Y's nominee is a foregone conclusion) voting for the Party X candidate whose views are the most reconciliable with their own. Though this brings the race closer to the center, Democratic and Republican party establishments generally dislike open primaries.
Occasionally, there are concerns about sabotage, or "party crashing," which involves voting for the most polarizing candidate in the other party's primary to bolster the chances that it will nominate someone "unelectable" to general election voters in November. An example is Republicans voting for Hillary Clinton in the 2008 presidential primary.

Closed primary:

Only voters registered with a given party can vote in the primary. Parties may have the option to invite unaffiliated voters to participate. Typically, however, independent voters are left out of the process entirely unless they choose to sacrifice their freedom of association for the opportunity to have their say in who represents them. Closed primaries may also exacerbate the radicalization that often occurs at the primary stage, when candidates must cater to the "base," yet the "fringe" of the party are typically more motivated to turn out.
In a few states, independent voters may register with a party on Election Day. However, they must remain registered with that party until they change their affiliation again.  A couple of states even allow voters registered with one party to switch their registration at the polls to vote in another party's primary. In these rare instances, a closed primary can more closely resemble open or semi-closed primaries than the closed primaries of other states.

Semi-closed primary:

Independents may choose which party primary to vote in, but voters registered with a party may only vote in that party's primary. The middle ground between the exclusion of independents in a closed primary and the free-for-all of open primaries, the semi-closed, primary mostly eliminates the concern about members registered to other parties "raiding" another's election.
Of course people who align with Party X may theoretically still vote in Party Y's primary if they just register as independent, but it appears most voters do not think that way. Moreover, the potential for sabotage through tactical party registration is also present in the strictest of closed primaries.

Top Two/ non-partisan primary:

This method puts all candidates, regardless of party affiliation, on the same ballot. The top two vote-getters then face off in the general election. This type of system is used in California, Louisiana,  and Washington, as well as in Nebraska for non-partisan election such as for the state's legislature.
Note on terminology: “Top Two” primaries are often referred to as “open primaries,” but that terminology has long been used in reference to the type of party primaries in which all voters may choose in which party’s primary to participate. By contrast, the "Top Two" system eliminates party primaries altogether. It is more accurately described as “nonpartisan primaries.” It would be more precise and less confusing to at least call them “nonpartisan open primaries.”
The following is a running list of states by types of party primary, updated December 2011:


Here are the individual state rules

State	Closed	Open	Semi-Closed	Source	Remarks	Presidential Primary or Caucus
Alabama		x		Ala. Code § 17-13- 7		Open
Alaska	R	D		Alaska Stat. §§ 15.25.014, 15.25.060	Parties select who may vote in their primaries. To vote in the GOP primary, a voter must be registered as a Republican 30 days before Election Day.	Open
Arizona			x	Ariz. Att'y Gen. Op. No. I99-025 (R99-049)	Arizona uses a "Presidential Preference" system instead of a traditional primary system. Voters must be registered for a party in order to receive a ballot.	Closed
Arkansas		x		Ark. Code Ann. § § 7-7-306- 308		Open
California	N/A	N/A	N/A	Proposition 14; CA S.B. 28	California uses the "Top Two" Plan. On June 8, 2010 voters passed Prop. 14 to create a nonpartisan blanket primary system in which all candidates are listed on the same primary ballot and the top two vote recipients face off in the general election.	R: Closed; D: Semi-Closed
Colorado	x			Colo. Rev. Stat. § 1-7-201	Closed, but unaffiliated voters may, however, change their party registration up until Election Day. Affiliated voters must change affiliation 29 days prior to the election.	Closed
Connecticut	x			Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 9-431, 9-59	Parties may choose to allow for semi-closed elections if they make a change to their party rules; however, as of now, the primaries remain closed.	Closed
District of Columbia	x			D.C. Code Ann. § 1-1001.09(g)(1); 1-1001.05(b)(1)	Closed primary for D.C. elected officials such as Delegate, Mayor, Chairman, members of Council, and Board of Education.	Closed
Delaware	x			Del. Code Ann. § 3110		Closed
Florida	x			Fla. Stat. Ann. § 101.021		Closed
Georgia		x				R: Semi-Closed; D: Open
Hawaii		x		Haw. Rev. Stat § 12-31	No party affiliation at registration.	Open
Idaho	R		D	Idaho Code Ann. § 34-904A	Until 2011, all Idaho primaries were open. After the GOP obtained a declaratory judgment that mandating open primaries violated freedom of association and was thus unconstitutional in Idaho Republican Party v. Ysura, the legislature passed a bill allowing parties to choose which type of primary they use. Democrats have chosen a semi-closed primary; unaffiliated voters may register a party at the polls on election day, but they are bound to that party affiliation at the next election.	R: Closed; D: Semi-Closed
Illinois			x	10 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/7-43, -45	Voters declare their party affiliation at the polling place to a judge who must then announce it "in a distinct tone of voice, sufficiently loud to be heard by all persons in the polling place." If there is no "challenge," the voter is given the primary ballot for his or her declared party.	Semi-Closed
Indiana		x		Ind. Code §§ 3-10- 1-6, 1-9	Classified as a "modified open" primary." A voter must have voted in the last general election for a majority of the nominees of the party holding the primary, or if that voter did not vote in the last general election, that voter must vote for a majority of the nominees of that party who is holding the primary. However, there is really no way to enforce this, and cross-over occurs often. The same modified open primary is used for the presidential primary.	Open
Iowa	x				Voters may change party on the day of the primary election.	Closed
Kansas	R		D	Kan. Stat. Ann. §§ 25-3301	Federal courts declared KS law unconstitutional and now the parties decide who will vote in their primaries. In 2012, Republicans will hold closed primaries; however, they will allow unaffiliated voters to register Republican on election day. Democrats will allow both affiliated and unaffiliated voters to vote.	Closed
Kentucky	x			Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 116.055		Closed
Louisiana		x		Act 570	The congressional primaries changed from a closed system to an open system with the passage of Act 570, effective January 1, 2011	Closed
Maine	x			Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, §§ 111, 340		Closed
Maryland	x			Md. Code Ann., Elec. Law §§ 3- 303, 8-202	Parties may choose to hold open primaries, but must notify the State Board of Elections 6 months prior.	Closed
Massachusetts			x	Mass. Gen. Laws ch.53 §37		Semi-Closed
Michigan		x		Mich. Comp. Laws § 168.575; Public Act 163	Voters do not have to declare a political party to vote; but must vote for all one party once they enter the voting booth.	Closed
Minnesota		x		Minn. Stat. § 204D.08		Open
Mississippi		x		Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-575	No registration by party affiliation. However, in order to participate in the primary, a voter must support the nominations made in that primary.	Open
Missouri		x		Mo. Rev. Stat. § 115.397		R: Semi-Closed; D: Open
Montana		x		Mont. Code Ann. § 13-10-301	No party registration in MT. Each voter has the choice which ballot to use on Election Day.	Open
Nebraska			x	Neb. Rev. Stat. § 32-702	Partisan primaires are closed, meaning congressional primaries are closed; however unaffiliated voters may vote for a candidate of a particular party.	Semi-Closed
Nevada	x			Nev. Rev. Stat. §§ 293.287, 293.518		Closed
New Hampshire	x			N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann § 659:14	Closed primaries in effect; but the statute allows for semi-closed primary if that party's rules allow for it.	Semi-Closed
New Jersey	x			N.J. Stat. Ann. § 19:31-13.2		Closed
New Mexico	x			N.M. Stat. §1-12-7.2	Parties may choose to allow for semi-closed elections if they make a change to their party rules; however, as of now, the primaries remain closed.	Closed
New York	x			N.Y. Elec. Law § 5-304		Closed
North Carolina			x	N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 163-59, -119	State law provides for closed primaries, but both parties have opened them up to unaffiliated voters, who may choose on Election Day.	Semi-Closed
North Dakota		x		N.D. Cent. Code, § 40-21-06	No party registration.	R: Closed; D: Open
Ohio	x			Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 3513.19	Voters' right to vote in the primary may be challenged on the basis that they are not affiliated with the party for whom they are voting in the primary.	Closed
Oklahoma	x			Okla. Stat. §26-1-104		Closed
Oregon	x			Or. Rev. Stat. §§ 247.203, 254.365		Closed
Pennsylvania	x			25 Pa. Stat. Ann. § 2812		Closed
Rhode Island			x	R.I. Gen. Laws §§ 17-9.1-23	An unaffiliated voter for the past 90 days may designate his or her party affiliation on election day by voting for that party in the primary.	Semi-Closed
South Carolina		x		S.C.Code Ann. §§ 7-11-10	A U.S. District Court judge ruled inGreenville County Republican Party Executive Committee v. South Carolina, that South Carolina's open primary is constitutional.	Open
South Dakota	R		D	S.D. Codified Laws § 12-6-26	Parties may choose to allow for semi-closed elections. Democrats have opened up their primaries to allow unaffiliated voters to vote.	R: Closed; D: Open
Tennessee		x		Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-7-115	Voters must affiliate with a party, but may choose to affiliate with that party on the election day. In Tennessee, voters are not registered with party affiliations.	Closed
Texas		x		Tex Elec. Code Ann. § 172.086	No registration by party; voters are not held to affilation of past election. Each year, voters have a clean slate and must choose on primary day whether to vote by a party affilation or as unaffiliated; voters are held to that affiliation in the runoff. For the presidential primary, it is the same system as of December 19, 2011.	Open
Utah	R	D		Utah Code Ann. §§ 20A-2-107.5	Parties may choose to open up the primary. Currently, Republicans have a closed primary while Democrats have opened up the primary.	R: Closed; D: Open
Vermont		x		Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 17, § 2363	No registration by party. For presidential primary, voters must declare which ballots they want.	Open
Virginia		x		Va. Code Ann. § 24.2-530	If a primary is called, it will be open.	Open
Washington	N/A	N/A	N/A	Wash. Rev. Code § 29A.52.112, 29A.36.171	Similar to California's Top Two system.	R: Closed; D: Semi-Closed
West Virginia			x	W. Va. Code § 3-5- 4	Technically a closed system, but all parties allow any voter who is not registered with an official party to request their ballot for the Primary Election.	Semi-Closed
Wisconsin		x		Wis. Stat. § 6.80	Voters may vote for only one party, but do not have to be affiliated with any party before coming into vote on Election Day.	Open
Wyoming	x			Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 22-5-212	A voter can change his or her party affiliation on election day.

,

Seems the media are all saying Romney is the GOP Candidate for 2012. Question.. Were all the other candidates rise and falls part of the plan to get Romney the nomination in the end?

Every media outlet, including alternative major outlets are saying the nomination has been sealed up and Romney is the GOP nominee for 2012.

So my question is.... were all the other candidate's distractions, rise and falls actually part of the big plan to have Romney as the nominee?

What I don't understand is how could people vote for a man who is more secretive than any other person running for President in history?

That man won't release his tax returns and he destroyed all documents from when he was Governor of Massachusetts. 

I was watching the Today show this morning and what is funny again they were talking about Iowa and they went through all the candidates and what they are doing, except for Ron Paul. 

I will say, I had vowed not to get involved in politics again as I used to be very involved and believed in politicians then I woke up.  Yet here I am getting involved in politics once more, but it is due to trying to help save our country and our freedoms.

I believe the election will be stolen from Paul, I believe those in the government in charge of the elections will commit fraud. 

I am also now wondering with all the Romney being the "One" with all the media, if that wasn't planned in the very beginning?  All the other distractions of the other candidates seem to have propelled Romney to the top and all the media outlets are propping him up as the best candidate for the GOP. 

We the people need to make sure people are educated about Ron Paul.  He sincerely is the only candidate that is "For the People."  The rest are simply spewing lies and false promises as they have always done.

Though Obama is the top liar ever in Presidential history.  The amount of "Hope, Lies, Promises" he made during his 2008 campaign is unbeatable.  Every thing that man said during his 2008 campaign was a complete lie.  I don't think he realizes he has lost most of his youth support and the people who had actually believed his lies but watched his presidency with open eyes, compared to those who have preferred to keep blinders on.

All I can say is our whole country is at stake and what is a shame is all of us who believe in freedoms and our country as the founding fathers had put together and envisioned is most likely not going to be saved. 

It is really sad that people are so brainwashed by the media and they don't think for themselves.  It seems most people allow others to think for them and to tell them what they need to do.  I guess 99% of the people are sheeple who refuse to wake up to truth. 

I am not going to give up, because I believe in an intellectual revolution in now trying to influence our state laws to insure our freedoms, because I now know those in D.C. are intent on taking away and have taken away every freedom our fore fathers had designed for the "New World."

I have been reading "Secrets Teachings of All Ages"

There are some really interesting parts in it.  I won't get into some of the more interesting sections that are part of symbolism and the Freemasonary. But at this moment, what applies to this post is the section of the forming of the U.S.

Did General Washington and Doctor Franklin recognize the Professor as an emissary of the Mystery school which has so long controlled the political destinies of this planet? Benjamin Franklin was a philosopher and a Freemason--possibly a Rosicrucian initiate. He and the Marquis de Lafayette--also a man of mystery--constitute two of the most important links in the chain of circumstance that culminated in the establishment of the original thirteen American Colonies as a free and independent nation. Doctor Franklin's philosophic attainments are well attested in Poor Richard's Almanac, published by him for many years under the name of Richard Saunders. His interest in the cause of Freemasonry is also shown by his republication of Anderson's Constitutions of Freemasonry, a rare and much disputed work on the subject.

It was during the evening of July 4, 1776, that the second of these mysterious episodes occurred. In the old State House in Philadelphia a group of men were gathered for the momentous task of severing the last tie between the old country and the new. It was a grave moment and not a few of those present feared that their lives would be the forfeit for their audacity. In the midst of the debate a fierce voice rang out. The debaters stopped and turned to look upon the stranger. Who was this man who had suddenly appeared in their midst and transfixed them with his oratory? They had never seen him before, none knew when he had entered, but his tall form and pale face filled them with awe. His voice ringing with a holy zeal, the stranger stirred them to their very souls. His closing words rang through the building: "God has given America to be free!" As the stranger sank into a chair exhausted, a wild enthusiasm burst forth. Name after name was placed upon the parchment: the Declaration of Independence was signed. But where was the man who had precipitated the accomplishment of this immortal task--who had lifted for a moment the veil from the eyes of the assemblage and revealed to them a part at least of the great purpose for which the new nation was conceived? He had disappeared, nor was he ever seen again or his identity established. This episode parallels others of a similar kind recorded by ancient historians attendant upon the founding of every new nation. Are they coincidences, or do they demonstrate that the divine wisdom of the ancient Mysteries still is present in the world, serving mankind as it did of old?

Above says the veil was lifted for a country to be born of which was to be truly a country of God and a country of Freedom.

What has happened?  The fact that the U.S. is now is ranking low in human rights and freedoms.  Other countries have more freedom for their citizens than the U.S.

All I can say in my opinion, is this Presidential election is sincerely the most important election in the history of the United States.   This election either people wake up and stand up for the country and our freedoms or we lose it all and we will be the USSR and Nazi Germany under a totalitarian regime.  

Which do you stand for?  Freedoms and our Constitution or Nazi dictatorship where we have check points on the road and we are violated in every way?  

We are at the crossroad this is the last stand for the country.  Will people stay influenced by the media which is propaganda and an arm of the dictatorship which is slowly gripping this country or will they open their eyes and think for themselves?

Video - The Compassion of Ron Paul

They are trying to say he is a racist? Yeah Right - Watch this, which was not done by Ron Paul but a Super Pac.

Here is a link to a Ron Paul Super Brochure. It is to help get the word out to Republican voters. People need to understand what Ron Paul is about and not from the media, since they hate him.

You can order the brochures and hand them out or pay for them to be sent out, there are many options.

CNN setting it up for the Election Fraud about to be committed in Iowa? Proof, They have Lied and have used fake polls before. Now everyone is using their "Romney is surging and ahead in Iowa Poll" I challenge Iowa to video tape the count they plan on doing in secret

Drudge and Huffington Post seem to be touting CNN's Poll today about how Romney is surging in the polls in Iowa and winning the polls.

I am saying I believe it is all Bullsh**!  I believe they are lying as they have done multiple times and they have used fake polls before to show Ron Paul at 0 in winning debates, because their polls had Paul at the top in winning in the debates.  I have a few posts about all the debate fraud polls committed by MSM.
Here is the CBS debate poll
Here is the CNN debate poll
Here is where CNBC wiped out their poll
All above post from from Ron Paul winning debate polls online.  There were many more polls taken down by MSM outlets.  Fox and O'Reilly had polls up and took them down or hid them when Ron Paul won them all.
They have all lied or hid the real information due to Ron Paul being ahead.  Why the hell should anyone believe them now? 


Here is the proof in a video - you just have to watch the first few minutes to see how CNN lied about polls.  Yet all the media is using CNN's poll today to say Romney is ahead?  I say BULLSH**!



All the media is lying and Huffington Post (owned by Time Warner - so essentially a MSM outlet now) and Drudge who should be real alternative media are not.  They are towing the line of those who want to control the election and always have their puppets in office.

Here is what Huffington Post has on their main page right now:

Here is what is on Drudge right this moment 12/29/11 11:05AM est: they were using the CNN poll linked earlier saying Romney was ahead in Iowa.  The alternative news are trying influence the voters right now - to get Romney nominated.

The media is lying about Ron Paul and those who control Iowa's elections are now going to count the votes secretly!

In other words because they know Ron Paul will win they are having to commit ELECTION FRAUD by counting them in secret!

I challenge the Iowa committee to count them in an undisclosed location but being VIDEO TAPED the WHOLE TIME!  Show to the world voting fraud will not be committed against Ron Paul!

Every media outlet is against Ron Paul, even the so called major "alternative media" outlets.

It is becoming where all of them are controlled in what information they release.  So those who only read the major alternative media sites are still not being fully informed.

I have complained about Drudge not informing their readers about the 1031 indefinite detention of U.S. citizens.

The media is lying to everyone.  The officials in the individual states will commit voter fraud of which I have no doubt.  They are going to get their "man" in who they control and is a puppet to the elite.  Romney won't release his tax statements and he shredded all the information from him being governor when he was leaving office.

In my opinion people need to start getting in front of their local state elected officials who are actually accountable to us and start demanding laws of the state that live by the Constitution and Bill of Rights of which our country was founded.

We do not have people in D.C. who represent us anymore.  We have people who represent the banks and big business.  People are waking up to that fact little by little but not fast enough.

I am stating I believe everything MSM and the major alternative media outlets are putting out all lies about Iowa and Romney being ahead in the polls!

I believe they are going to commit election fraud in Iowa and in the states following Iowa and votes for Ron Paul will either be thrown out or given to the "elite's 1% man" Romney.  

I believe there are more people for Ron Paul than for the other GOP candidates.

I am asking people to challenge their local election committee to video all counting of the primaries and caucuses to prove there is no election fraud happening.    

Just yesterday - The Today Show said Who ever comes in second not named Ron Paul is the real winner.  

WTF?! Video - Today Show 12/28/11 - Chuck Todd "Who ever Comes in Second and not named Ron Paul in Iowa is the REAL Winner" MSNBC site - has "Paul Bearers" under Ron Paul's profile to subliminally affect people's thoughts of Paul.

A seriously WTF statement!  I watched some of the Today Show on this morning 12/28/11 when they began talking about the Iowa Caucus.  Chuck Todd was on and Matt Lauer asked him what is Ron Paul's chances after Iowa?

Chuck Todd replied "Ron Paul has no chance and who ever comes in second in Iowa is the REAL Winner.  Ron Paul is not a real candidate, he has no real backing from the GOP, he is a fringe candidate who ever wins second not named Ron Paul is the winner."

I went to MSNBC's site to see if I will be able to get the video of the Today show.  There I found the politics page has a profile for each GOP candidate.

I am appalled at what MSNBC has under Ron Paul's profile.  I took a screen shot of it:  (10:10 AM est - they have changed what I screen captured earlier today with "Paul Bearers".  They have a picture of Newt up on Ron Paul's page now - latest screen shot of Ron Paul's Profile page on MSNBC is at bottom)

For them to have "Paul Bearers" under Ron Paul's picture is outrageous!  This is about the most horrendous thing I have seen from MSM regarding Ron Paul and their smear campaign against him.  They are implying he is too old and will be dead soon, in my opinion!  It is disgusting and shows how bias they are.  Not one MSM site is unbias towards Ron Paul, it is so obvious.  Now they are even trying to subliminally influence people and their thoughts of Ron Paul, as if people are 'carrying' the dead. 

Also notice the background of his picture they have up?  Looks like a Funeral Home look.


All I can say is what is MSM going to use as an excuse when Ron Paul wins New Hampshire and then other primaries?

Oh Wait..... they will keep counting the ballots in secret as they are now going to do in Iowa to commit voting fraud! 

I can tell the establishment, all  you have to do is read the comments throughout the net on all the hit pieces on Ron Paul on MSM and alternative news sites to see he has a major following.  Those who follow him are the ones who are awake and aware of what the government has been doing in stealing everyone's money and liberties.  People are Disgusted with all the D.C. folks they are saying "NO MORE" we are taking our government and country back!

We are not stupid, we will know when the government commits voting fraud!


I believe we need to have another country over see our voting here in the United States, just as the U.S. over sees other countries elections against fraud.


I will get the video of Chuck Todd on the Today Show as soon as it is available and put it in this post.

UPDATE - 8:01 AM Video of Chuck Todd this morning on the Today Show 12/28/11
Watch this video, Matt Lauer says "It is just Ron Paul" and he mentions his name with 'disgust' in his voice, besides Chuck Todd saying anyone who comes in second and not named Ron Paul will be the REAL winner of Iowa. 

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

At least the word has been getting out about CNN and their unfair biased editing of the Ron Paul interview, where they implied he stormed off camera and ended the interview. Drudge had information about that and now Huffington Post is running an article about it.

UPDATE 12/28/11 10:10 AM EST - Here is what is on Ron Paul's Profile page now on MSNBC - they took the picture of Ron Paul off with "Paul Bearers" under it and have put a picture of Newt up

Update  - I just found this on Huffington Post - What Bullsh**!  It is about Romney and they only mention Paul once in the article.  It says that the GOP Leader was on a morning show saying the winner and the GOP candidate will be quick - implying Romney is going to be the GOP man!

He will be the man ONLY IF there is FRAUD in the voting process! 

UPDATE - This is on What Really Happened - It is a Video from a 2008 Debate that FOX news will not reair!

MUST WATCH!

Recall of Federal Elected Officials has begun in Montana - Those who voted for The Defense 1031 Bill (Indefinite Detention of U.S. Citizens)

I received an email with this information in it!

Another exciting event happening, besides the fact Tennessee has a bill in the Senate to void unconstitutional Federal laws.

Montana has begun a campaign to recall it's Federal elected officials who voted for Bill 1031 (Indefinite Detention of U.S. citizens). 

This is so Awesome!  Those in the other states listed as being able to recall your officials, please start something there.  We really do have the power, we just have to use it and take positive steps and actions!

The information comes from Daily Kos and a person who is part of the recall campaign.

Here is the info about Montana's recall effort.

From the press release:

Moving quickly on Christmas Day after the US Senate voted 86 - 14 to pass the National Defense Authorization Act of 2011 (NDAA) which allows for the indefinite military detention of American citizens without charge or trial, Montanans have announced the launch of recall campaigns against Senators Max Baucus and Jonathan Tester, who voted for the bill.

Montana is one of nine states with provisions that say that the right of recall extends to recalling members of its federal congressional delegation, pursuant to Montana Code 2-16-603, on the grounds of physical or mental lack of fitness, incompetence, violation of oath of office, official misconduct, or conviction of certain felony offenses.

Section 2 of Montana Code 2-16-603 reads:

"(2) A public officer holding an elective office may be recalled by the qualified electors entitled to vote for the elective officer's successor."

The website Ballotpedia.org cites eight other states which allow for the recall of elected federal officials: Arizona, Colorado, Louisiana, Michigan, Nevada, North Dakota, Oregon, and Wisconsin. New Jersey's federal recall law was struck down when a NJ state judge ruled that "the federal Constitution does not allow states the power to recall U.S. senators," despite the fact the Constitution explicitly allows, by not disallowing ("prohibited" in the Tenth Amendment,) the states the power to recall US senators and congressmen:

"The powers not...prohibited...are reserved to the States...or to the people." - Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

The issue of federal official recall has never reached the federal courts.

Montana law requires grounds for recall to be stated which show conformity to the allowed grounds for recall. The draft language of the Montana petitions, "reason for recall" reads:

"The Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees all U.S citizens: "a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed..."
The National Defense Authorization Act of 2011 (NDAA 2011) permanently abolishes the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial, "for the duration of hostilities" in the War on Terror, which was defined by President George W. Bush as "task which does not end" to a joint session of Congress on September 20, 2001.
Those who voted Aye on December 15th, 2011, Bill of Rights Day, for NDAA 2011 have attempted to grant powers which cannot be granted, which violate both the spirit and the letter of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.
The Montana Recall Act stipulates that officials including US senators can only be recalled for physical or mental lack of fitness, incompetence, violation of the oath of office, official misconduct, or conviction of a felony offense. We the undersigned call for a recall election to be held for Senator Max S. Baucus [and Senator Jonathan Tester] and charge that he has violated his oath of office, to protect and defend the United States Constitution."

Montana residents William Crain and Stewart Rhodes are spearheading the drive. Mr. Crain is an artist. Mr. Rhodes is an attorney, Yale Law School graduate, and the national president of the organization Oath Keepers, who are military and law enforcement officers, both former and active duty, who vow to uphold their Oath to the US Constitution and to disobey illegal orders which constitute attacks on their fellow citizens.  Rhodes said:

"These politicians from both parties betrayed our trust, and violated the oath they took to defend the Constitution. It's not about the left or right, it's about our Bill of Rights. Without the Bill of Rights, there is no America. It is the Crown Jewel of our Constitution, and the high-water mark of Western Civilization."

Rhodes noted that:

"Two time Medal of Honor winner Marine General Smedley Butler once said "There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights." Time to fight. "

Butler famously ended his career as a Marine General by touring the country with his speech and book denouncing war, "War is a Racket."Butler confessed that he had spent most of his life as a "high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers...a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism..."

Eighteen states at present have recall laws, most of which do not apply to federal officials. For these and other states to recall federal officials, state legislatures would have to first pass or amend such laws.

Rising on the House floor to oppose the bill based on the military detention provisions for Americans, Rep. Tom McClintock said before the House vote:

" today, we who have sworn fealty to that Constitution sit to consider a bill that affirms a power contained in no law and that has the full potential to crack the very foundation of American liberty."

Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders said in opposing the final NDAA:

”This bill also contains misguided provisions that in the name of fighting terrorism essentially authorize the indefinite imprisonment of American citizens without charges.”

And in a New York Times op-ed piece by two retired four-star U.S. Marine generals, Charles Krulak and Joseph Hoar, Krulak and Hoar said that "Due process would be a thing of the past."

Montana would be the first recall drive to be launched as a result of the vote for the NDAA military detentions provisions. A number of Facebook pages appeared after the passage of the bill from locations across the country.

References:

Facebook: "Recall Every Congressman Who Voted for the NDAA"
http://www.facebook.com/...

"Recalling Senators and Congressmen"
http://www.uscitizensassociation.com/...

"How to Recall US Senators and Congressmen"
http://recallthetraitors.blogspot.com/...

The power of yourself. Making a Difference and influencing positive developments for ALL people! Here is the proof - You (We) do have power! Tennessee Bill against unconstitutional Federal Laws

Last night I got the greatest Christmas gift on Christmas day!  Believe it or not the gift was a comment on one of my post on the blog.

What post was that, you ask?

http://sherriequestioningall.blogspot.com/2011/12/email-to-my-tennessee-state-legislative.html

I inserted an email I wrote to all of my state elected officials, which was about the 1031 indefinite detention bill. 


 I don't believe anyone can just sit back and think it is useless to try and do something, when our country is at stake and all of our freedoms.    

I am here to prove it is not useless.  I am energized after the comment (Christmas present) was left.

In the email I sent to my state officials, I had the Bill of Rights, the wording of the 1031 bill (Indefinite detention) and the information and fact that state law is superior to federal law, when the federal law is unconstitutional.

Here is the comment that has gotten me hyped, excited and what I think is the greatest Christmas gift:

Anonymous said...

You will be pleased to know we are working as I write with Tennessee Senators in legislation to do just what you have set out. Please read SB 0620 and HB 1212. I think you will be pleased.

December 25, 2011 6:30 PM 

I did a quick search and here is what I found about the bill:



SB 0620
Campfield
HB 1212
Ragan

Committee to assess constitutionality of all federal laws. Creates the "Tennessee Nullification Reaffirmation Act." Requires the general assembly to appoint a committee to review all federal laws and regulations to ensure that they are all constitutional, according to the federal and Tennessee constitutions. Requires such committee make a recommendation for nullification within 30 days. Requires the general assembly to vote on the nullification following the recommendation. Prohibits the federal law or regulation from being recognized within the state if the general assembly votes to nullify it. (S: Campfield; H: Ragan)



Now those who know me, know I can get very hyper over exciting news!  Last night I was as hyper as you can imagine - I was doing my happy dance when I read the comment and looked up the information of the Tennessee bill.  

I wrote my elected officials, three times all together about the 1031 bill.  The link provided was my first email to them.  I wrote (inserted here in the blog) my other two emails to them, one was with the video of Levin revealing Obama is who required U.S. citizens be part of the 1031 bill and the other was with all the proof of FEMA camps.  

Now that I know there is something in the Senate of Tennessee and I have the names of the two who wrote the bill...... you can just imagine what I will be doing!  :)   Take a huge guess..............  think their phones will be ringing?  I may even drive to Nashville and try and see all of them now.

In fact, if there others from Tennessee reading this, who would like to join me - we can all meet in Nashville together and do some lobbying for the constitution and to pass the bill above.  

It starts with one - after one state, others will follow.  Help your state be the one.

I am now telling everyone - TO CONTACT YOUR STATE ELECTED OFFICIALS!  PLEASE I BELIEVE ALL OF US STARTING A MOVEMENT OF GETTING THE STATES TO ONLY ADHERE AND OBSERVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS!

Here is the link to Every State Website to find your State Elected Officials Email addresses - those in Tennessee I made it easy on you.  Go to the link of my email to my officials, every state elected official email address is in the post, just copy and paste them into an email.  

BELIEVE YOU HAVE POWER, BELIEVE IN THE POWER OF ONE, BELIEVE THAT A POSITIVE PEACEFUL FORM OF ACTION CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE!  

PLEASE JOIN ME - WRITE YOUR STATE ELECTED OFFICIALS - USE THE EMAIL I WROTE OR WRITE A BETTER ONE!  BUT PLEASE - YOU CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE!  PROOF HAS BEEN PROVIDED! 

So... for those who have left comments on various posts on the blog, basically saying: "Where has that writing your officials gotten you, except with a reservation to a FEMA camp?"  I am now able to say.... it has now gotten me possibly from ever getting thrown in a FEMA camp!  Now.... protect yourself and fellow state citizens - WRITE/EMAIL YOUR STATE ELECTED OFFICIALS - TODAY!   

Those who write their state officials, please consider sending me the batch of email addresses for your state officials, so I can put it on the blog and help others from that state to also send an email to them.  It takes a small amount of time to get all the email addresses but it is well worth the time and effort expended.  I will put up a new page across the top, on the blog just for state elected official email addresses, if people send me them.

MERRY CHRISTMAS EVERYONE! I SINCERELY KNOW THE LIGHT AND LOVE OF GOD IS WITH US ALL. NOT JUST TODAY BUT ALWAYS

MERRY CHRISTMAS TO EVERYONE

THE LIGHT AND LOVE OF GOD IS WITH EACH AND EVERYONE OF US NOT JUST DURING THE HOLIDAY SEASON BUT ALWAYS!

I SINCERELY WISH EVERYONE A BEAUTIFUL- LIGHT, LOVE AND TRUTH FILLED 2012 NEW YEAR!  

I BELIEVE THE TRUTH OF WHO WE ARE AND THE I AM ENERGY IS STREAMING THE EARTH AND AWAKENING US ALL!

THROUGH LOVE WE CAN CONQUER ALL!  REMEMBER LOVE AND LIGHT ARE THE ONLY TWO REAL THINGS IN LIFE.  ALL THE OTHER IS JUST A DOT OF OUR WHOLE!

WE ARE EACH BEAUTIFUL AND PERFECT SOULS LIVING IN AN IMPERFECT WORLD!

MAY THIS HOLIDAY SEASON HELP YOU AND YOURS SEE THE LIGHT AND LOVE IN EACH OTHER AND ALL THINGS AND ALL PEOPLE, NOT JUST FOR NOW BUT FOR ALWAYS!

TOGETHER OUR LOVING ENERGIES CAN CHANGE THE WORLD!

 For your Enjoyment:

John Lennon - Happy X-mas
Remember and radiate your love to the world and all people!
The images are sad..... but through Love we can change what is happening-radiate/expand your love to all who need it!
WE HAVE THE POWER - WE JUST HAVE TO REALIZE IT AND HAVE FAITH IN GOD AND OURSELVES!

LOVE IS THE GREATEST GIFT WE CAN GIVE OURSELVES AND ALL OTHERS!

Email sent out by Roger Weigand (Trader Rog) to David Morgan (Silver-Investor) - Something Odd is happening with the Banks in Europe and exchanges Today 12/24/11.

David Morgan

David Morgan of Silver-Investor.com  

sent me an email today from Roger Weigand of WeBeatthestreet.com .                          Roger Weigand

Both  of them are metals experts and always keep their eyes on what is happening in the investment area of metals and mining.   

                                                                  

I have had the pleasure of interviewing both previously about the "Red Alert" email regarding the plans of confiscating metals by the government, for the IMF and One World Currency.  fyi - Roger has communicated with me that I could post the email here.

                                                                                                  

It seems something is going down with the banks in Europe today.  Here is Roger's email sent out to other  experts in the metals (Gold and Silver) field.

Here is the email:




Trader Tracks Situational Alert Saturday, 12-24-11 -Christmas Eve at 740am PST - roger wiegand -Traderrog:

"We have received a report of unusual banking activity. Banking screens on 138 different currencies are show 00.000.  Some rate fluctuations are beginning to appear. There have been no answers on this activity but banks have been notified to expect a large change in currency rates." (quote not attributed to protect the source).  

In our view, what is happening is a massive devaluation in probably the Euro Currency relative to the values versus individual nations. The ECB loaned over $600 Billion (produced out of thin air with no collateral) last week to European Central Bank Member Nations. We think this next step is to re-configure the values of the Euro within each member country. 

Obviously the little broken ones like Greece, Portugal and Ireland will be de-valued MORE relative to Germany and France. Last report we got said the consortium of countries amounted to 27 total.  The B.I.S., the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland is the bankers' bank. The BIS is very secret about their work and activities. They are probably the orchestra leader in this event. 

We also noticed later Friday that the ECB is taking a $40 Million dollar lease in a New York City Building. Are they moving the whole headquarters from Brussels, or is this a newer and bigger expansion of the ECB?  I think its an expansion and the IMF is fin charge for sure in charge. The IMF is gathering cash from member nations to cover their activities in propping-up Europe and who knows who else. This is all part of the grand scheme moving to a One World Government and One World Currency. 

In our view, when the credit and bond markets break-down, the global Super-Crash is underway in an expansion of Greater Depression II.  Read your history from 1900 to 1918. This is being exactly replicated from 2000 to 2020. The Panic of 1908 was repeated in our Panic of 2008. The bigger world war begins on schedule from 2013-2014 to 2018. We think the gold and silver rally can peak in 2017 but perhaps extend all the way to 2024. 

After Obama is re-elected next year, we forecast a larger expansion of demonstrations not only throughout the world but in major cities in the USA. The calls for impeachment will reach new screaming levels after the dirtiest political campaign in history. There will be lawsuits and re-calls with lots of voter fixing and tampering. We think Romney is the GOP candidate and he will not have one chance in a one million to be elected. 

Someone has filed a $1 Trillion Dollar lawsuit in this mess and there is a lock-down on information relative to the suit and to the impending (we think) devaluation. It is obvious to us that this is being done over the Christmas holiday so markets cannot react as they are closed.  Many will not open until next Tuesday after the designated Monday, Christmas holiday in the USA. 

If my prognosis is correct, this could be a real market mover and perhaps a real market shocker. If I am correct in my surmising what these people are doing, precious metals might rally in a vicious snap-back valuation on fear and security. Gold and silver are being technically pressured to the high side anyway. If this event proves to be true, hang on to your hat. I would not be trading anything but watching first to see what markets do in Asia on Monday evening on Bloomberg in America. -Traderrog

Roger Wiegand
Editor Trader Tracks Newsletter

I do want to state, the part of "Obama being re-elected" next year in the email, is not something I agree with at all, nor the part of Romney being the GOP nominee.  I sincerely hope people are smarter than that and Ron Paul will be the nominee.

Here is a post I did about the One Trillion Law Suit filed.

But what the heck is going on in Europe right now?  Perfect week to do something, when everyone is distracted and busy with the holidays.  Watch what the banks are doing.

FAIL! Gingrich, Perry, Bachmann, Huntsman and Santorum FAILED to get 10000 signatures to be in Virginia Primary! ONLY PAUL and Romney in Primary

This is just too good and funny!

Gingrich, Bachmann, Huntsman, Santorum and Perry could not come up with 10,000 signatures to be in the Virginia Primary for their names to be on the ballot.

But Paul and Romney did get the 10,000 signatures needed.

Fox news reported about Gingrich and Perry.  

After verification, RPV has determined that Newt Gingrich did not submit required 10k signatures and has not qualified for the VA primary," the Republican Party of Virginia announced early Saturday on its Twitter website. 

Texas Gov. Rick Perry also fell short of the 10,000 signatures of registered voters required for a candidate's name to be on the primary ballot, but former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and Texas Rep. Ron Paul will be on the ballot. 

CNN is also reporting Gingrich and Perry not getting the 10000 signatures.

Then the Washington Post wrote about the rest:

Republican presidential candidates Michele Bachmann, Jon Huntsman and Rick Santorum failed to qualify for the Virginia ballot, according to state GOP officials.

The Washington Post is saying that Gingrich and Perry have claimed they did submit the signatures needed, but the GOP officials have not been able to verify the signatures!

LOL, so did they falsify signatures?

This will be interesting, no doubt in the days ahead.

I expect to hear law suits being filed by the candidates to have their names on the ballot in Virginia.  I have no doubt that Judges will end up allowing their names, because they are the establishment after all.

But if the tables were turned and Ron Paul's signatures were not verified, I would have no doubt the courts would keep Paul's name off the ballot.

Expect MSM going full throttle negative against Paul.  Watch the only time they will mention his name is to be negative.

A CNN reporter is reported to have said that "We have the power to get candidates elected or not."

FYI - even the alternative news sites are against Ron Paul.  All you have to do is go to Huffington Post and read the comments, they are towing the line of MSM.   The comments about Paul are saying "Bigot, homophobe and pot heads are for him.  So MSM is really working trying to get one message out about Paul and some are biting.  It is up to everyone who knows the truth that Paul is the ONLY candidate that actually believes in the Constitution of the United States and the only one that believes the citizens of the United States should be free. 


The forces are aligned against Paul and his message.  But I believe most people will be able to see truth and hopefully start seeing the bullsh** that MSM throws out.   As MSM discounts Paul and proclaim any primaries or caucuses he wins doesn't count, then won't people wake up and wonder why?   I have to believe people have some common sense.

Media and Ron Paul. All of a sudden they are mentioning his name. But it is always to say "He is crazy and any win will discredit that state"

If you need an excuse to vote for Ron Paul, all you have to do is watch MSM and their now recognizing Ron Paul is in the Presidential race.  The way they are bashing and saying if he wins Iowa then Iowa will not count.

The media is saying he is not electable and the future of the Iowa caucuses are at stake.  

They are pushing Romney, Romney Romney

People are waking up and they are thinking who is the ONE person that makes sense and since he is not bought and sold by the banks and corporations and believes in Freedoms and believes in the Constitution which is something the rest of all those in government don't believe in anymore.  What the government traitors believe in is..... chains of debt prison and jail and slavery for every single citizen.  They believe citizens should be the slaves of the banks and corporations and if someone steps out of line they should be taken out and gotten rid of. 




Young Turks - Telling it like it is about the Media and their outrageous push against Ron Paul - EXCELLENT VIDEO! 




CNN - Would NOT accept the newsletter information from Ron Paul - yet over and over again she kept asking him about it - he finally walked out of the interview, because she would not accept his answer!  It shows it is the only one thing they can try and attack him on and they don't accept the answer.


Here is MSNBC mentioning Ron Paul and the guest throws in all kinds of negative comments about him.




Here is Hardball totally putting down Ron Paul.  Saying if Paul wins Iowa then Romney is the guy who is the nominee.  Saying the GOP is lacking practicality if Ron Paul wins, because he is not a real GOP nominee.
Says Ron Paul is unacceptable in GOP and for all the people of the U.S..  They brought up the newsletters trying to say he wrote them.   They completely are saying Iowa is discredited if Paul wins, but not discredited if Romney wins. 



 The videos go on and on in how the media over and over is putting out on the air how people can not vote for Paul and in doing so they discredit their state.

SO MEDIA......... I HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS FOR YOU.

IS THIS REAL INFORMATION?  IF YOU ACTUALLY DID REAL NEWS AND INFORMED PEOPLE OF WHAT IS HAPPENING THEN LET ME ASK YOU......................

WHY HAVEN'T YOU INFORMED THE PEOPLE ABOUT MF GLOBAL STEALING BILLIONS FROM THEM?

WHY HAVEN'T YOU INFORMED THE PEOPLE ABOUT WHAT CONGRESS - SENATE AND OBAMA DID - IN COMMITTING TREASON AND CITIZENS CAN BE TAKEN BY THE MILITARY FOR THE REST OF THEIR LIVES WITHOUT RIGHTS.  THE U.S. CAN ALSO SHIP THEM OVERSEAS TO OTHER COUNTRIES TO BE TORTURED. 

MAIN STREAM MEDIA YOU ARE THE JOKE - YOU ARE SCUM PROPAGANDA - YOU ARE ALL BOUGHT AND SOLD - YOU ARE SLAVES TO YOUR MASTERS - YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!

PEOPLE ARE WAKING UP TO THAT FACT!  KEEP SCRAMBLING FOR YOUR MASTERS THAT CONTROL YOU, WHILE THE REST OF US LOOK AT YOU WITH DISDAIN AND LAUGH AT YOU, KNOWING YOU ARE NOTHING BUT DIRT UNDER THE NAILS OF HIGHER UPS. THE PEOPLE WHO ARE AWAKE KNOW YOU ARE NOTHING BUT DIRT TO BE CLEANED OFF ALSO!

Why did Drudge only have the Indefinite Detention information up for ONE DAY ONLY on 12/15/11 after it was passed? Drudge Controlled Alternative media?

I have got to say, Drudge only had the Indefinite Detention information up for ONE DAY ONLY and that was 12/15/11 the day it was passed by CONgress and the Senate and it was taken down by the next day.

Why is that?

I had been watching for days before hand to see if Drudge would put something up, he never did.  Even when Huffinington Post had articles about what was going on, Drudge was SILENT!  Just like all the MSM has been silent.


Why doesn't Drudge still have the the fact up that CONgress, the Senate and Obama took our most basic rights away, in regards we are no longer free people but can be picked up at the will of the government and held for the rest of our lives without charges, a trial or rights to an attorney, besides being murdered by the government as Senator Graham said on the Senate floor?

This is one of the most important events of our life times and in the history of the U.S. 

The fact that Obama is the one who made sure that U.S. Citizens were part of the bill.  You would think Drudge would have made sure all his readers knew that.  Instead it was after the fact of the bill being passed did he bother to let his readers know about it and only for a short period of time.

I am officially saying, I believe Drudge is a controlled media outlet, just like MSM.  He does not give real news that impacts everyone most of the time.  If you notice he has the "sensational" news on his site.  He puts divisive news and distraction news, just as MSM does.

Huffington Post does not have any information on their front page anymore but at least they had written many articles about it before it was passed, unlike Drudge who was silent.


This is not one of those stories that should be allowed to go to the back page now that it is over with.  This is not over with.  This is one of the most important news stories in the history of the U.S. and every single citizen needs to be informed about it.    This information has to stay on the front page of all alternative news outlets until everyone is informed.

The government gets away with "murder" (that is what Senator Graham has said can be done to the U.S. citizens with the bill too) because the people are uninformed about what the government has done and is doing. 

We can not let this issue die down.

It seems that this news is "Too Big to Broadcast" for the media.  This issue should be causing every citizen asking their state officials to protect them from the unconstitutional federal government.  The unconstitutional federal government should be causing every state elected official to immediately pass laws protecting their state citizens and secede from the U.S. if necessary.  Lets see if Texas and all the big talk out of there previously about seceding a couple of years ago, starts standing up and yelling about what the Fed government did.  I want to see Governor Perry stand up for his State Citizens against the unconstitutional Federal government to protect his state.

Where are all the Governors on this issue?  Call yours up and ask them, what they plan on doing to protect their state citizens?

Update 12/19/11 - Drudge has an article linked this morning to Info Wars - titled Ron Paul warns of Martial law being enacted in U.S. The article is great it has all the information someone needs about the 1031 bill, internet control and even the FEMA camps. I am happy to see that Drudge is actually informing their readers about everything.