Germany: Warns Cyprus Banks may never reopen without Euro bailout. Putin most Powerful Man in the World right now. Euro Zone will be decided by Russia.

UPDATE - 3/21/13 -   Russian PM Medvedev - Moscow no warning of Cyprus Levy - Threatens reducing Euro holdings and going Gold! 

Here is what we do know about Cyprus/Euro Zone/Russia.

The ECB, IMF and the Euro Zone Financial ministers had made the condition of the bail out for Cyprus with the bank deposit levy being enacted in Cyprus.   They knew full well the largest amount of money in the banks was Russian mafia/mob dirty money being laundered which they were attempting to grab.

The whole money stealing scheme went terribly wrong.  They did not expect it to back fire on them.  They have let the world see, they are willing to steal everyone's money in the banks for their own good.  They have revealed they are blood sucking people who will do anything to save their own asses and keep their little group together at the cost of all the people in the world.  The have shown that no one's money is safe in any bank no matter the country as they can make demands upon it.   The only reason the Cyprus people did not get their money stolen from them was due to the Russians.

No doubt due to many phone calls from the Russians (mob/mafia) that had money in the bank to the parliament members, letting them know what would happen to them and their families if they voted to steal billions from them in the banks.  The parliament members thought it best to go against the wishes of the Euro Zone and vote "No" on the levy of deposits.

But it appears the Russians were warned in the first place along with government and bank employees, as billions had fled the banks just days before the surprise announcement of the levy last Friday from those groups.   Even though there was inside information, they could not get all their money out before the levy announcement and the banks closed.

Russia is sending Naval ships for permanent deployment in the area now.  Putin has been very vocal, saying it was an unfair and dangerous for Cyprus to levy the bank deposits.   There are gas fields in Cyprus waters that Russia would like to get their hands on.

The Euro Zone caused Putin to become the most Powerful man in the world right now, in my opinion.  The Euro Zone's future lays completely in Putin's hands at this time.   I am sure they did not mean to do that and the whole money stealing scheme went so terribly wrong for them, they ended up giving the balance of power to Russia.   Remember, Russia and China are cozy with each other and they trade between themselves without using the dollar, as they swap currencies now.    China has stayed out of the bailing out of the Euro in the past, but how much skin do they have in the game?


The German Finance minister has warned the Cyprus banks may never reopen again if Cyprus does not get a bail out from the Euro Zone.

Germany's finance minister has warned Cyprus that its crisis-stricken banks may never be able to reopen if it rejects the terms of a bailout.
Wolfgang Schaeuble said major Cypriot banks were "insolvent if there are no emergency funds".

______________________________________________________________
UPDATE 12:25 PM est - Cyprus banks will not reopen until next Tuesday at the earliest.  When they do reopen, 'Capital Controls' may be in place.
I wonder how the Russians feel about not being able to get their money and afterwards only being allowed to a small part of it each day?  The Cyprus banks and parliament is in quite a predicament. They have the Euro Zone on one side and the Russian mafia on the other.  I sure wouldn't want to be a politician in Cyprus right now.  I am sure many of the parliament members wish they were not at this time either.  
_____________________________________________________________________________

The Finance minister for Cyprus tried to resign and instead is up in Russia right now, having discussions about Cyprus and Russia's future together.

Russia at the moment has won the poker hand against the Euro Zone.  Their hand was called and Russia ended up having a Full House compared to EZ's straight.  The game is still being played so we don't know who will actually walk away winning and if Russia has a Royal Flush to win it all.  I would bet any Russian hands played against the Euro zone will have to have China's approval too.

Even the small country of Cyprus leaving the Euro would be a major blow, with the house of cards falling down.  At all cost the Euro Zone can not allow that to happen.

Nigel Farage told everyone to get their money out of the banks, yesterday and the Euro Zone would do anything to keep their currency going, including stealing everyone's money.

Here are my questions and what we don't know at this moment:

Will Russia completely bail out Cyprus and be their 'savior' by making agreements with them for their gas fields and a Naval port, thus giving them the money they need for their banks to reopen?


Does Russia want Cyprus to stay in the Euro?  Is it to Russia's advantage to have Cyprus stay with the Euro Zone or would it be better for them to go back to their previous currency (pound)?


Could Russia get their ultimate revenge upon the Euro Zone, who wanted to steal their money by the billions from their bank accounts and help Cyprus leave the Euro Zone and once that happens the Euro Zone collapses?


Would Russia benefit from a Euro Zone collapse or do they benefit more from the Euro Zone staying together?


What are China's thoughts on the Euro's future, how much do they have invested in that future?
One thing I have noticed: not one Chinese online news site has mentioned Cyprus this week, which I have found very odd.


The status of the Euro has now just been handed to Russia and it will actually be Putin's and Russia's decision of what happens.   Putin can thank all the Euro Zone ministers, including Merkel and Bernanke for making him the most powerful man in the world, in my opinion.

Think about it.... Russia/Putin can literally take down the Western Banking world at this point.  Do they push Cyprus to leave the Euro Zone and finance them or help them stay in the Euro?  House of cards fall for the bankers if they leave. 

What I have read is, once you have crossed the Russian Mob, they will get their revenge no matter what, even if it is years away.  They continue their revenge handed down for generations.


The Poker game is continuing.  Who will blink now?  Who holds the strongest cards? I know if I was betting on the game who I would be backing.

Here is an interview that Jim Willie (Hat Trick letter and Golden Jackass) just did on the 13th of March.  He said the Euro Zone would blow from a small to medium bank going under at around the 25 min mark .  Must listen to interview.  He has hit it on the head and has gotten the prediction completely correct!





Update 3/21/13 - Germans have a Naval Port agreement in Cyprus that can be broken with 3 months notice by Cyprus.  Russians want it. 

UPDATE 3/26/13 - Jim Willie Interview about Cyprus and inside information

43 TRILLION dollar suit against U.S. govt. officials and major banks! Accuses of stealing from U.S. people and money laundering. Screenshots of CNBC running it.

UPDATE 10/27/12 - 8 AM est- Article not on CNBC anymore and CNBC digital Sr. V.P. executive's children are murdered just hours after article originally put on CNBC.  



Now this will BLOW you away!

A racketeering lawsuit was filed in the U.S. against top U.S. government officials and the wall street banks!  It is for the tune of 43 TRILLION dollars!

What is even MORE shocking is this information is on CNBC!  Imagine that!

I have captured screen shots of the website, just in case the article gets taken down!  This way there is a record of it.  I am putting the shots in this post along with the information.  

You have to read the article... thousands of complaints have been served to bankers around the world and government officials!  This is HUGE!

The law firm that has brought this suit is the Spire group out of New York.  They have led many suits against the bankers!  They are AWESOME! 

One  small portion....  but the whole article from screen shots are below!  I got it all, as I said in case the article/information gets "disappeared" from the internet!

 Plaintiffs now establish the location of the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) of laundered money in a racketeering enterprise participated in by the following individuals (without limitation): Attorney General Holder acting in his individual capacity, Assistant Attorney General Tony West, the brother in law of Defendant California Attorney General Kamala Harris (both acting in their individual capacities), Jon Corzine (former New Jersey Governor), Robert Rubin (former Treasury Secretary and Bankster), Timothy Geitner, Treasury Secretary (acting in his individual capacity), Vikram Pandit (recently resigned and disgraced Chairman of the Board of Citigroup), Valerie Jarrett (a Senior White House Advisor), Anita Dunn (a former "communications director" for the Obama Administration), Robert Bauer (husband of Anita Dunn and Chief Legal Counsel for the Obama Re-election Campaign), as well as the "Banksters" themselves, and their affiliates and conduits. The lawsuit alleges serial violations of the United States Patriot Act, the Policy of Embargo Against Iran and Countries Hostile to the Foreign Policy of the United States, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (commonly known as the RICO statute) and other State and Federal laws.

 The complaint - which has now been fully served on thousands of the "Banksters and their Co-Conspirators" - makes it irrefutable that the epicenter of this laundering and racketeering enterprise has been and continues to be Wall Street and continues to involve the very "Banksters" located there who have repeatedly asked in the past to be "bailed out" and to be "bailed out" in the future.

UPDATE 10/28/12 -  Here is the lawsuit in full.


43 Trillion Complaint

Lawsuit for ALL Homeowners against the Fraud Of Banks and Money Laundering has begun! Every single homeowner has a right to start one themselves too! This is a Class Action!

I have a call into this law firm and have left a message.  I will be adding any/all more information if/when I am able to talk to someone at Spire about this lawsuit.  I will find out how all of us can do our own lawsuit or add or names to this one.

Everyone Start or join one - Let's hit them hard with thousands/millions of lawsuits!  Please pass this information on to everyone you know!  

UPDATE AT BOTTOM FROM MY TALKING TO THE LAW FIRM - 1:23 PM 4/30/12

LAWSUIT AGAINST THE MAJOR WALL STREET BANKS FOR FRAUD AND MONEY LAUNDERING! 

NEW YORK, NY--(Marketwire - Apr 23, 2012) - In a lawsuit alleged to involve the largest money laundering network in United States history, Spire Law Group, LLP -- on behalf of home owners across the Country -- has filed a mass tort action in the Supreme Court of New York, County of Kings. Home owners across the country have sued every major bank servicer and their subsidiaries -- formed in countries known as havens for money laundering such as the Cayman Islands, the Isle of Man, Luxembourg and Malaysia -- alleging that while the Obama Administration was publicly encouraging loan modifications for home owners, it was privately ratifying the formation of these shell companies in violation of the United States Patriot Act, and State and Federal law. The case further alleges that through these obscure foreign companies, Bank of America, J.P. Morgan, Wells Fargo Bank, Citibank, Citigroup, One West Bank, and numerous other federally chartered banks stole hundreds of millions of dollars of home owners' money during the last decade and then laundered it through offshore companies. The complaint, Index No. 500827, was filed by Spire Law Group, LLP, and several of the Firm's affiliates and partners across the United States.

Far from being ambiguous, this is a complaint that "names names." Indeed, the lawsuit identifies specific companies and the offshore countries used in this enormous money laundering scheme. Federally Chartered Banks' theft of money and their utilization of offshore tax haven subsidiaries represent potential FDIC violations, violations of New York law, and countless other legal wrongdoings under state and federal law.

"The laundering of trillions of dollars of U.S. taxpayer money -- and the wrongful taking of the homes of those taxpayers -- was known by the Administration and expressly supported by it. Evidence uncovered by the plaintiffs revealed that the Administration ignored its own agencies' reports -- and reports from the Department of Homeland Security ‐‐ about this situation, dating as far back as 2010. Worse, the Administration purported to endorse a 'national bank settlement' without disclosing or having any public discourse whatsoever about the thousands of foreign tax havens now wholly owned by our nation's banks. Fortunately, no home owner is bound to enter into this fraudulent bank settlement," stated Eric J. Wittenberg of Columbus, Ohio -- a noted trial lawyer, author and student of US history -- on behalf of plaintiffs in the case.

The suing home owners reveal how deeply they were defrauded by bank and governmental corruption ‐‐ and are suing for conversion, larceny, fraud, and for violations of other provisions of New York state law committed by these financial institutions and their offshore counterparts.
This lawsuit explains why loans were, in general, rarely modified after 2009. It explains why the entire bank crisis worsened, crippling the economy of the United States and stripping countless home owners of their piece of the American dream. It is indeed a fact that the Administration has spent far more money stopping bank investigations, than they have investigating them. When the Administration's agencies (like the FDIC) blew the whistle, their reports were ignored.
The case is styled Abeel v. Bank of America, etc., et al. -- and includes such entities as ML Banderia Cayman BRL Inc., ML Whitby Luxembourg S.A.R.L. and J.P Morgan Asset Management Luxembourg S.A. -- as well as hundreds of other obscure offshore entities somehow "owned" by federally chartered banks and formed "under the nose" of the Administration and the FDIC.

Commenting further on the case, Mr. Wittenberg stated: "As if it is not bad enough that banks collect money and do not credit it to homeowners' accounts, and as if it is not bad enough that those banks then foreclose when they know they do not have a legally enforceable interest in the realty, we now learn that they have been operating under unbridled free reign given by the Administration and some states' Attorneys General in formulating this international money laundering network. Now that the light of day has been shined on it, I believe we can all rest assured that the beginning of the end of the bank crisis has arrived."

All United States home owners may have the right to bring a lawsuit of this kind if they paid money to a national bank servicer during the years 2003 through 2009.

One lawyer impacted by the corruption -- Mitchell J. Stein, who formerly represented the FDIC, the RTC and the FSLIC during the Savings and Loan scandal of the 1990s, and who predicted all of the foregoing in open court two years ago -- commented: "Two years ago, I remarked in open court to a Los Angeles Superior Court Judge, as well as to legislators including Senator Dianne Feinstein's office during a multitude of in‐person meetings, that the ongoing violations of the Patriot Act by these financial institutions was outrageous and a breach of the public trust of unprecedented proportions," said Stein.

"The size and scope of this misconduct -- stretching to far‐away islands never before having standing as approved United States Bank affiliates -- is remarkable and emblematic of what we have seen," he continued. "The bank crisis represents the height of corruption and brazen behavior where our historically trusted financial institutions have no qualms about breaking the law, because they have the Administration behind them. Banks do well enough when they operate lawfully without needing to be permitted to operate as criminal enterprises that steal money from United States citizens."

Additional plaintiffs' counsel Nicholas M. Moccia commented: "Having been in the trenches of the bank crisis for years, I always knew that the misconduct was being conducted by a network. When I started litigating against banks, however, I could have never imagined that it would be this extensive. I look forward to taking discovery of these thousands of obscure foreign entities and to obtaining for homeowners their constitutionally entitled injuries for this international ring of theft and deception."

Comments were requested from the Attorney Generals' offices in NY, CA, NV, and MA and the White House, but no comment was provided.

About Spire Law Group
Spire Law Group, LLP is a national law firm whose motto is "the public should be protected -- at all costs -- from corruption in whatever form it presents itself." The Firm is comprised of lawyers nationally with more than 250‐years of experience in a span of matters ranging from representing large corporations and wealthy individuals, to also representing the masses. The Firm is at the front lines litigating against government officials, banks, defunct loan pools, and now the very offshore entities where the corruption was enabled and perpetrated.

Contact Information

• 
  Contact:
  James N. Fiedler, Esq.
  Managing Partner
  Spire Law Group, LLP
  877‐475‐2448
  Email Contact

UPDATE - 1:23 PM 4/30/12 

 

I spoke to the law firm.  It seems they want $10,000 to $18,000 from anyone who wants to join the suit.  

 

First you would have to send all of your information to them to see if you qualify to be part of the suit, if you do and wanted to join it, you would have to give them $10,000 to $18,000 to join it.

Also they are suing for the Loan value of your mortgage plus punitive damages.  

 

I asked so then are you taking a 33% cut from the award?  She said "Yes, they will take a 33% of what ever the judge awards."

 

I expressed to her, they sure are taking a lot and $10,000 is a lot of money for someone to join in a lawsuit and then them take 33% on top of that.

 

So, I am sorry I put the information in about this lawsuit.  It seems it is strictly a way for a law firm to make some big money from people.  What needs to happen is a REAL Law firm with REAL intentions of helping people should take on a suit like this.  I have a problem that someone has to pay the attorney twice with this.  First a lot to join in and then part of the award.  It should be either or, in my opinion, not both.