Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Lawyer for Class Action Suit Nation Wide against Deutsche Bank, sent me an "Urgent" email - Please pass along


Lenore Albert, a lawyer out of California who has been on top of the MERS fraud for years, sent me an URGENT Email.

She has been working on getting Class Action Suits going against MERS banks. 

She started another one against Deutsche Bank.  But she needs people that have had the situation listed below.

This is her "Urgent" email to me that I got:

I need to get the word out. We just beat an order to show cause on a complaint and are allowed to file our second amended complaint because it is adequately plead but judge then issued a motion for summary judgment to ensue to see if we have evidence to prove the claims. I need two things:
1. Know if anyone else received a modification from HomEq that was 'faxed' to them and it looked like there was a missing page or a missing term.
2. Who has had their house sold at foreclosure when they were under BK Stay order by the defendants in this case.
3. Any evidence or information appreciated!!! Here is the proposed complaint.

The proposed complaint she sent me is in PDF form.  I am not able to put it here.  But I am putting some of the first paragraphs.

PLEASE CONTACT LENORE ALBERT and pass this information along to everyone you know that may be similarly situated.  She needs people Immediately that have had the situation listed above with HomeEq.

Lenore L. Albert, Esq. SBN 210876
LAW OFFICES OF LENORE ALBERT
7755 Center Avenue, Suite #1100
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
Telephone (714) 372-2264
Facsimile (419) 831-3376
Email: lenorealbert@msn.com

Attorney for Plaintiff, HELEN GALOPE, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
HELEN GALOPE, an individual, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE UNDER POOLING AND SERVICING AGREEMENT DATED AS OF MAY 1, 2007 SECURITIZED ASSET BACKED RECEIVABLES LLC TRUST 2007-BR4; WESTERN PROGRESSIVE, LLC; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Defendants.
CASE NO. SACV 12 00323-CJC (RNBx)
Assigned to the Hon: Cormac J. Carney
PROPOSED SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
PLAINTIFF, HELEN GALOPE, on behalf of herself and those similarly situated bring this national class action against defendants for conducting its business practice in an unlawful, unfair and fraudulent manner as alleged herein.
I. VENUE
PROPOSED SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
GALOPE v DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, et al CASE NO. SACV 12 00323-CJC (RNBx)

1. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action under 28 USC § 1332 wherein this is a class action over $5,000,000.00 where at least one plaintiff is diverse from one defendant. Alternatively, federal question jurisdiction exists under 28 USC §1331 based on the 11 USC §362 violation.
2. The Court has personal jurisdiction over the defendants in this action by the fact that the Defendants are conducting business in the state of California.
3. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 USC § 1392 because the action involves real property located in the Central District of California; and pursuant to 28 USC § 1391(b) because a substantial part of the events or omissions on which the claims are based occurred in this District.
II. PARTIES
4. At all times mentioned herein, Plaintiff HELEN GALOPE was the title owner by way of a grant deed to the property duly recorded in the Los Angeles County Recorder’s Office, Book 391, pg 40-42 more commonly known as 19117 DELANO STREET, TARZANA, CALIFORNIA 91335 (hereinafter referred to as “The Premises”) which was her principal residence (APN 2128-022-022).
5. Defendant, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as trustee under pooling and servicing agreement dated as of May 1, 2007 securitized asset backed receivables LLC trust 2007-BR4, has its principal place of business in Santa Ana, California and is registered to do business in the State of California and claimed to be the
PROPOSED SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
GALOPE v DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, et al CASE NO. SACV 12 00323-CJC (RNBx)

title owner of The Premises, by virtue of a trustee’s deed from defendant Western Progressive, LLC at the time this action was originally commenced.

Thursday, May 31, 2012

FBI labeling "Occupy Movement" as "Domestic Terrorists". But the FBI themselves are the ones inside it, that planned all 'foiled bombings'

The FBI is labeling the "Occupy Movement" as domestic terrorists now. They are doing this due to "foiled bombing" plots. But get this..... all those plots of bombing.... were by inside under cover FBI agents. So it was all a set up to stop the Occupy Movement.

One thing I would like to make clear. I believe all the misinformation of who is involved and behind the Occupy movement is ALL disinfo. This way people do not join en-mass. This way people stay away from coming together against the fraud of Wall Street. The amount of disinfo is amazing. The Occupy movement is by "The People" who are trying to stand up to the Fraud of Wall Street, especially since the SEC and Government will not.

Now the government will really keep people from joining together against Wall Street fraud, because if people do they then will be "Terrorists."
 

Is this another way they take away our Freedom of Speech (what little is left) as you are labeled a Terrorist if you stand up to the Fraud?

I just posted about how Matt Taibbi said the SEC is part of covering up Wall Street Fraud  this morning.



 

Video - Matt Taibbi on Viewpoint with Eliot Spitzer "SEC hiding and covering up the evidence of Fraud and ignoring Whistleblowers"

Short interview video but still powerful in information. Matt Taibbi blows the SEC out, saying they are hiding all the evidence of the fraud of Wall Street from the public and they ignore whistleblowers. They only go after small companies and they let the big companies go.


 Eliot Spitzer had him on "Viewpoint." Matt Taibbi revealed how Goldman Sachs accidentally released damning information about the illegal activities of Wall Street, 2 weeks ago. I wrote about it and said JP Morgan is part of the covering it up.

 Have you noticed how not one word has been mentioned about the information released by Goldman Sachs? Have you heard the SEC or FBI saying they are going to go after them? The answer is NO!


That shows the SEC does cover up the REAL Wall Street Fraud! The article he mentions he wrote in the video about the SEC being part of the cover up of Wall Street crimes is here.

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

WOW - What will be a Legendary Rant From illinois Representative on Congressional Floor! Awesome!

This is so completely Awesome! What will be a legendary Rant from an Illinois Representative on the Congressional Floor! 


All of our Elected Officials Should stand UP this Way for The People!  I am not sure who it is that is in the video at this time, but when I find out I will put it here. 

Update***It is Mike Bost, a Republican member of the Illinois general assembly*** He reminds me of the "Network" movie "I am MAD AS HELL and I am not going to take it anymore" rant.
I would like to know who that woman is behind him with that smirk on her face. All her constituents need to see what she thinks of them and the Constitution. 


I found his information - We should all contact him and say THANK YOU!  *


Email: rep.bost@hotmail.com
Springfield Office:
202-N Stratton Office Building
Springfield, IL 62706
(217) 782-0387
(217) 557-7213 FAX

District Office:
300 E. Main
Carbondale, IL 62901
(618) 457-5787
(618) 457-2990 FAX
Jackson County
Email: Anna, IL - (618) 833-3247

Years served: 1995 - Present

Committee assignments: Committee of the Whole; Higher Education (Republican Spokesperson); Consumer Protection; Veterans Affairs; Telecommunications; Transportation & Motor Vehicles; Energy Management, Subcommittee.

Biography: Full-time state legislator and business owner; born Dec. 30, 1960, in Murphysboro; graduated, Murphysboro High School; attended University of Illinois Certified Firefighter II Academy; served in U.S. Marine Corps (1979-82); married (wife, Tracy), has three children.


UPDATE - I emailed him and said THANK YOU!




Class Action Suit Against Citibank for not Responding to RESPA Letters sent by Homeowners.

I have a tab/page that is strictly a RESPA letter to send to your mortgage lender.

By sending the RESPA letter the banks are required to answer all the questions you have to your lender regarding your loan.   Of course they can not answer all of them due to the Fraud they commit with mortgages.

Many times people get back letters from the banks with some of the information but then a note saying "other information is privileged information."

There is a Class Action Suit that has now been started against Citibank for them not responding to the RESPA letters. 

Law Offices of Rosario Sicuranza
This Is An Class Action Already Filed
Defendant Type Mortgage Company
Defendant Company Citimortgage
Scope of Investigation
Court Having Jurisdiction United States District Court of NY Eastern District
Cause of Action The case alleges that CitiMortgage Inc. routinely violates section 6 of RESPA by not responding to QWR\\\'s, or responding inappropriately with form letters that are completely unresponsive to th
Who would Qualify Any homeowner with a CitiMortgage, INC serviced mortgage who sent in a QWR to Citi and received nothing in return, received a form letter response or a non-responsive response from Citi. Here is the text of the complaint...
When you see the above "QWR" here is what it is:

What is a QWR?

A qualified written request is a legally crafted letter written pursuant to Section 6 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures act of 1974 to your lender requesting that an issue related to a real estate based loan or a mortgage be cured -AND- that the lender send you documents related to such loan be forwarded to you. The QWR does two things for the homeowner. First is sets off 2 timers. The bank MUST acknowledge the receipt of the QWR with 20 days of its receipt. Secondly, the bank must resolve the issue within 60 days. The bank is PREVENTED BY LAW from reporting the homeowner as late on payments during this 60 day period and most of the banks continue to halt late credit reporting after this 60 day period. Further, the lender MUST forward with their answer to your QWR, a phone number and name of an individual employee of the bank who is assigned to handle your issue. This is a much better situation than being one of the millions of blind sheep that call in on the customer service number for help to be rebuffed, ignored, put off or denied by an $8.00/hour bank employee with no ability to effect a change for you.
 I can not impress enough that people need to send out the RESPA letter that I have on the page no matter where you are with your mortgage, behind or not.

We all have to hold the banks accountable to their fraud.  The more that people stand up the more the people will win.  The banks have committed fraud and we the people are having to pay for their fraud over and over again.

It is time for all of us to help stop the fraud, we do this by working collectively to expose the fraud over and over again, until all judges rule correctly with contract laws and not ignore them for the  banks.

Saturday, May 26, 2012

Ted Butler "CFTC Has Lied and Complicit with the Silver Manipulation." Also, U.S. Govt. will directly prop metal manipulation - no middleman?



If you have been a reader of Ted Butler for the last few years, you would know, he has believed that the CFTC would eventually do the right thing regarding the Silver manipulation of the price.

Ted Butler gave up yesterday on May 25th, 2012.  He wrote an article saying all the CFTC members need to resign and have accused them of lying and being complicit with the silver manipulation. 

He has pushed people to write the CFTC members over the last few years, asking them to do the right thing.  He was part of the reason why they were investigating the Silver manipulation.  He would write how he believed Chilton on the CFTC board would be part of the solution in getting things fixed and the manipulation stopped.

Last month I wrote about how Bix Weir has accused the CFTC of being formed, just to hide the manipulation and part of making sure it keeps going.

Yesterday an article came out on GATA, about how Obama is bailing out the COMEX and London Exchange directly in the future as the U.S. has labeled them "Too Big to Fail."  As I see it, they did this in part due to JP Morgan's problems and they will now simply and directly manipulate the metals with the exchanges.  They also are propping up the exchanges so all the banks can still gamble with the derivatives and in essence it will be a back door to bailing out the banks and all their bets.   This way the banks can keep making their Trillions of bets on derivatives and when they fail the government gives money to the exchanges and that then is letting the bank off the hook.   Also, is this part of cutting out the middleman of the manipulation and the U.S. government will do it directly with the exchanges?

One thing about that.  Entities can manipulate the paper markets many times over as they print money, but they can not stop the physical metals from being depleted.  I have noticed this last week there were many MSM financial articles trashing Gold, saying investors know not to buy into the gold as it is a bad investment.  To me they are more afraid than ever that more people will invest in metals dues to the currency problems of the world happening.  They have to do all they can to make people afraid of metals, so they keep writing how bad it is.

Here is the Ted Butler article, calling for the CFTC board resignations and accusing them of lying.

Ted Butlers article:

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has been negligent in failing to terminate the obvious manipulation ongoing in silver. Furthermore, the agency may be complicit in this manipulation. Worse, it has lied to the public and elected officials. This all goes back to the time when Bear Stearns was taken over by JPMorgan in March of 2008. It is well known that Bear Stearns went under as a result of a sudden loss of liquidity amidst a run by creditors and customers. What is not well known is that those problems were greatly exacerbated by a $2 billion margin call on silver and gold short positions from the end of December 2007 to March 2008. I believe the silver and gold margin calls were at the heart of Bear Stearns’ failure.

We know now (from CFTC correspondence to lawmakers in 2008) that JPMorgan took over Bear Stearns’ giant silver and gold short positions on the COMEX. Up until that time, we did not know that Bear Stearns was the concentrated silver and gold short. Using Commitment of Traders Report (COT) data, Bear Stearns had a COMEX silver short position of no less than 35,000 net contracts and a COMEX gold short position of no less than 60,000 net contracts from the end of December 2007 to their takeover by JPMorgan two and a half months later. From December 31, 2007 to mid-March 2008, the price of silver rose by $6 (from $15 to $21) and the price of gold rose from $850 to over $1000. Based upon the number of contracts held short by Bear Stearns and the price movement at that time, that resulted in margin calls of $2 billion. I would contend that was the real reason for Bear Stearns’ demise. 

So where do I get off claiming that the CFTC is complicit in the silver manipulation and lied about it to the public and to lawmakers? This is easy to prove. On May 13, 2008, the CFTC published a 16 page public response to my allegations of an ongoing manipulation in silver by means of a concentrated short position. The response was based upon silver market activity through the end of 2007, thereby conveniently sidestepping the drama that occurred through March 2008 when the biggest silver short in the market, Bear Stearns, failed and needed to be rescued with taxpayer assistance (Federal guarantees given to JPMorgan). The May 13, 2008 report from the CFTC went into great lengths in explaining there was nothing amiss on the short side of silver, even though the Commission knew that two months before the report was issued, the biggest concentrated short had failed and needed to be rescued by taxpayers. A lie by omission is no less of a lie. 

Why am I bringing this up now? Because I’ve had enough of the CFTC’s lies and its refusal to do its job. As a result of the transfer of Bear Stearns’ concentrated short position becoming visible in the August 2008 Bank Participation Report the Commission initiated another formal investigation of the silver market, this time by the Enforcement Division. This investigation is now 3 years and 9 months old, the longest-running investigation in U.S. Government history. It has lasted longer than most wars. Just as with the two prior investigations by the Division of Market Oversight, the current investigation is a phony investigation. I say this because there has been no attempt by the Enforcement Division to contact me or anyone claiming that silver has been manipulated. It’s clear that the agency does not want to get to the truth. The agency keeps initiating investigations which involve time and taxpayer money, but they never check with the person who has caused them to investigate in the first place. 

Only two of the five commissioners currently serving at the agency were at the Commission when JPMorgan took over Bear Stearns or when the Enforcement Division began its current investigation. But all have received vastly more public complaints about silver than for any other commodity. None of them can claim ignorance of the issue. Chairman Gensler preaches about the need for transparency in our markets. How about some transparency for the Commission? The Commission lied in its May 13, 2008 report (by omission) and is lying now when it claims to be conscientiously investigating silver. See my article from 2009.


The stalled investigation has only served as cover for the crooks at JPMorgan and the CME to manipulate the price of silver more egregiously than ever before. I think it’s time to press for the removal of all current commissioners, including Gensler and Commissioner Chilton. Who wants to hear platitudes when a serious crime is in progress? Clearly, the Division of Market Oversight lied in its 2008 letter and the Enforcement Division is lying now. Who needs public servants like these?

Please send this article to your Congressman or Senator and ask them to investigate. Also please e-mail the Commodity Futures Trading Commission with your comments.

ggensler@cftc.gov Chairman Gensler
bchilton@cftc.gov Commissioner Chilton
jsommers@cftc.gov Commissioner Sommers
Somalia@cftc.gov Commissioner O’Malia
mwetjen@cftc.gov Commissioner Wetjen
dmeister@cftc.gov Director Meister









Wednesday, May 23, 2012

The Revolution Will NOT Be Televised - Video: Wall Street and Ron Paul

A Video I created with a Poem/Music by Gil-Scott Heron "THE REVOLUTION WILL NOT BE TELEVISED" Wall Street and Ron Paul are NOT Televised. 

Though the words may seem slanted in one way - the pictures show for ALL People and the words are correct in saying "The Revolution Will Not Be Televised."  As it is not televised. 





Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Did you catch what Jamie Dimon said yesterday 5/21/12 in an Investment Conference? Big Slip Up!



Okay, here is the "trick" question...

Did you catch what Jamie Dimon said yesterday 5/21/12 during an Investment Conference?

This is So Good!  Wow, he sure did slip up.... but will people notice the slip?


Please read this article:

Portions - first few paragraphs from the Bloomberg article:

JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)’s biggest U.S. competitors say their corporate investment offices avoid the use of derivatives that led to the bank’s $2 billion loss and buy fewer bonds exposed to credit risk.

Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc. (C) and Wells Fargo & Co. say the offices don’t trade credit-default swaps on indexes linked to the health of companies. JPMorgan is said to have amassed positions in such indexes that were so large they drove price moves in the $10 trillion market.

The loss has prompted shareholders to join regulators in scrutinizing how banks use their investment offices to hedge risks and manage deposits they aren’t using for loans. JPMorgan’s competitors confine corporate-level trading mostly to interest-rate and currency swaps -- the most common derivatives -- and put a greater percentage of funds into U.S. government- backed securities such as Treasury bonds.

“Traditionally, banks use government bonds, because they’re safer,” said Ray Soifer, a former Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. bank analyst who’s now chairman of Green Valley, Arizona-based Soifer Consulting LLC, which advises banks and investors on strategy and risk management. “JPMorgan is going down the credit spectrum from U.S. Treasuries, because they’re reaching for yield.”

Seeking Returns

The concentration of assets that carry the risk a borrower might default reflects JPMorgan Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon’s push over the past five years to seek higher returns at the New York-based bank’s chief investment office, as reported by Bloomberg News April 13. Dimon said at an investment conference yesterday that the bank has more of such assets than competitors, while asserting it isn’t taking undue risks.

“We have more credit exposure than other people, and we think when we put that credit exposure on, it was actually very good,” said Dimon, 56. “We bought some triple-A securities that we think are as good as gold.”

About half of the $381.7 billion in JPMorgan’s chief investment office portfolio is in company bonds, asset-backed securities and mortgage debt not backed by the U.S. government, according to a March 31 filing. That compares with 7.7 percent at the end of 2007. The amount, $188.1 billion, is more than the holdings of such securities by its three biggest competitors combined. It exceeds the total assets of Atlanta-based SunTrust Banks Inc., the 10th-biggest U.S. lender.

Okay... did you see what I read and the "slip up?"

I LOVE IT!

I believe if people paid attention they would realize all the talk against Gold and all the "Elite" coming out and saying "Civilized people don't buy Gold." B.S

The Elite/bankers then slip up and say what they really think of Gold,  in their discussions. 

Above is a perfect example from Jamie Dimon, out of his own mouth.

If you didn't get what I am talking about the first time, here is the key wording.


“We have more credit exposure than other people, and we think when we put that credit exposure on, it was actually very good,” said Dimon, 56. “We bought some triple-A securities that we think are as good as gold.


Don't cha just love these slip ups of how much bankers actually think of Gold, though publicly they trash it?

Thanks Jamie for letting us know how much you Value Gold now and it being the "Top" Investment! 




Monday, May 21, 2012

Bill Murphy of GATA and LeMetropoleCafe, Rare Sunday Commentary "CFTC may be Forced to Do Something soon about the Silver Shorts."


    

 

 

 

 

 Bill Murphy the Founder of GATA (Gold Anti Trust Action Committee) and who has a Gold subscription Newsletter at  www.LeMetropoleCafe.com , wrote a special Sunday Report.  Bill has been kind enough to give me permission to reproduce it here in full.  

(Update 5/22/12 at bottom)

Some of it is about JP Morgan and the information regarding their 2 Billion (ever increasing day by day - now 5 billion) losses through their "hedging" trade desk.  

It is extremely interesting information especially the part about the CFTC and their being at the edge of having to take some action, regarding JPM's metal shorts.  

Since the newsletter is being reproduced in full, you will see Bill's other comments/information on various other financial events, like the FB (Facepalm) IPO. 

Thank you Bill for allowing me to reproduce the information you sent out to your subscribers! 

Here is Bill Murphy's extra newsletter information sent out on May 20th 2012: 

 

May 20 - Gold $1591.60 -  Silver - $28.70


JPM, Facebook, Gold … And The Potential of A Titanic Financial Market Event

"The way I see it, if you want the rainbow, you gotta put up with the rain." … Dolly Parton

GO GATA!!!

The reason for this rare, extra commentary over a weekend is to focus on a couple of points which really stand out in their particular significance and are worth pondering in terms of what is coming down the road for financial markets.

The first is what we jumped all over on PLANET GATA from the get-go about the JP Morgan hedge trade flap gone wrong. It made NO sense from the very beginning to any of us that such a commotion was made over a $2 billion loss on a trade, for whatever reason, when they had just reported yearly gains of $18 billion. Clearly, Mr. Dimon’s public pronouncement, that caught the attention of the entire investment world, was only paving the way for future announcements that will be much more dramatic. All he was doing when he inferred the losses MIGHT get worse was protecting himself, as best he could, by going on the record.

The latest news on JPM…

14:31 JPM JP Morgan Chase struggling to unwind ill-placed bets - WSJ
While breaking no real news, this story notes that the bank's losses could eventually prove to be even bigger than the $5B some people familiar with the matter have been predicting (see linked comment). The losses could potentially deepen if the company sells its positions into a market that has turned against said positions.
The article notes that while the bank has said that it will take its time unwinding the positions, this does not necessarily guarantee smaller final losses than trying to close out the trades sooner, as the market could turn sharply against the bank in the near term.
Reference Link: Wall Street Journal
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100014240527023038796045774126
13778263918.html
* * * *

14:50 JPM CFTC latest federal agency to begin investigating JPMorgan Chase - NYT DealBook
NYT Dealbook reports, citing people briefed on the matter, that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission opened an enforcement case on Friday examining the bank's trading loss. The CFTC joins the SEC and FBI in investigating possible wrongdoing at the bank. Gary Gensler, the agency's chairman, is expected to disclose the investigation when he testifies on Tuesday before the Senate Banking Committee.
Dealbook says that the CFTC will potentially examine whether the bank’s trading affected the market for credit derivatives, for which it has jurisdiction.
Reference Link: NY Times - http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/05/18/c-f-t-c-said-to-open-inquiry-into-jpmorgan-loss/
* * * * *

This latest investigation into JP Morgan might be a big deal for the GATA camp. This is actually quite complicated, but very intriguing. The CFTC has been investigating JPM’s role in the silver market manipulation scheme for what will be four years soon. FOUR YEARS! Good friends, like Dave from Denver, have nothing but loathsome talk about the CFTC, for good reason. GATA’s rationale (speaking for myself) about this ridiculous investigation is that the CFTC really has uncovered the scam, but because it is backed by the US Government, they are flabbergasted about what to do, so they do nothing.

The reason they have not closed the case is because they are petrified the silver market might blow up down the road. Think about if you were them. They want this to go away, but if the silver market does blow up, and there is some kind of "Force Majeure" declared in silver by JPM, the CFTC would not only look like fools, but, perhaps it might be said they were more than negligent. Thus, they have done nothing.

Well, all of a sudden, Lo and Behold a new factor enters the silver scam investigation, which directly affects Morgan’s constant claims to the CFTC that their huge silver short position is hedged. Ya mean like hedged in an economic sense as per their claims re the latest credit derivatives market trade was a hedge? This just might force the CFTC to demand JP Morgan prove their claims their silver short position is really a hedged one. This is what I suspect might occur due to the growing scrutiny over Morgan’s trading activities. The CFTC people, except for Bart "Elliot Ness" Chilton, are sycophants and have toed the company line … but there is a point when FEAR makes that no longer viable. They are not going to go to jail for taking one for the team. My guess is we are getting close to that Tipping Point.

As the JP Morgan hedged losses mount and become "official," the heat on them is going to mount. They will be scrutinized every way imaginable. How can all the class action lawsuits against them, and blatant evidence against them via just what Andrew Maquire has sent to the CFTC via their role in the silver scam, be ignored?

We have already been informed, as of a week ago, that the Morgan losses on their "hedge trade" fiasco could be as high as $15 billion, or more. Already, even the WSJ is alluding that their losses are higher than $5 billion. This is MEGA! As we have discussed on PLANET GATA, this is not just about Morgan, but confidence in the entire financial system. If the $70 trillion derivatives book at Morgan goes NUCLEAR, we could have a financial market TITANIC event which might be right around the corner.

GOOD GRIEF!

Now, for the weekend edition, number two re the understandable, but nauseating, commotion over the Facebook IPO on Friday, which was heralded by CNBC all week.
First, the background…

*The Dow is going down day after day, not with any fanfare, but all rallies are sold. In very quiet and subdued selling, general investors inherently know something is wrong and are acting upon that instinct.

*Europe is falling apart we know, but little is being said about how the US financial system is in parallel with Europe. How bad is this? Just the state of California budget deficit goes from something like $8 billion to a staggering $16 billion and it creates almost no commotion. Huh?

Getting back into the GATA aspect of this is that the US financial markets are all about market manipulation. You need to go nowhere further on what the real deal about US financial markets than this headline…

Banks spend big to prop up Facebook shares on first day of trading

By GARETT SLOANE and MARK DECAMBRE
Last Updated: 8:15 AM, May 19, 2012
Posted: 11:34 PM, May 18, 2012

It was another Wall Street bailout — but this time the banks had to cough up the cash. Facebook’s underwriters propped up the social-network’s trading debut yesterday, as the shares threatened to crash through the initial public offering price of $38. The banks working on the massive $16 billion IPO, including Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs, did their duty by buying up large blocks of Facebook stock toward the end of the day to support the price. 

Facebook shares opened up 11 percent at $42.05, and traded as high as $45, before running out of steam, disappointing investors hoping for a big first-day pop. The shares closed up just 0.6 percent at $38.23.
Without the bank bailout, Facebook’s IPO would have been a loser on the day, Wall Street insiders said.
The heavy buying, however, cut into the banks’ already meager fees on the deal. The underwriters agreed to accept a smaller cut — just 1.1 percent of the $16 billion Facebook raised in the IPO — in order to land the high-profile assignment.

After splitting $176 million in fees, the firms likely spent more than they made in fees by buying the swooning stock. Sam Hamadeh, CEO of research firm Privco, believes the banks spent around $380 million on Facebook stock. 

"On the heels of JPMorgan’s $2 billion ‘hedging’ trading loss, tThe underwriters have used up all the fees they made on the Facebook deal just to buy and prop up the stock to prevent a busted IPO," said Hamadeh.

Another source said that the banks took a substantial hit yesterday, which started strong despite glitches that delayed Nasdaq trading in Facebook shares by 30 minutes past their 11 a.m. scheduled debut.
While there was plenty of finger-pointing yesterday, many blamed the bankers for setting the price too high to allow for upside. The IPO share priced at the high end of the $34 to $38 range, which had been raised from an initial range of $28 to $35. 

The bankers were wary of pricing the shares too low, leaving money on the table and leading to an outrageous first-day pop. They were shooting for a modest first-day gain in the range of 5 percent to 10 percent. 

Still, some observers heaped scorn on Facebook insiders who dumped their shares, saying it was a red flag that weighed on the stock. 

Facebook had increased the number of shares being sold in the IPO by 25 percent, to 425 million, with most of the additional float coming from early investors looking to cash out. 

The company’s sky-high valuation also made some investors queasy. At $38 a share, Facebook is valued at $104 billion — even though it only made $3.7 billion last year.

Facebook’s big day was a drag on other tech stocks. Trading in shares of Zynga was halted yesterday after a sharp drop, and the stock closed down 13.4 percent at $7.16. China’s social network RenRen was also down more than 20 percent, to $4.93.

-END-

My take on this, from my Behavioral Finance background on how our financial system really operates, is the effort to hold up the Facebook IPO was an effort to hold up the stock market as a whole. For the BF folks, perception is everything. That is why they do what they do. The Counterparty Risk Management Policy Group (do a Google if new to you), led by the same firms that held up the Facebook share price, does not exist for no reason. One of their mandates is to promote market stability and that is what they just did. That Group works closed with the Plunge Protection Team (Working Group on Capital Markets) to support the US stock market at various times.

What we saw in the price rises of gold and silver at the end of the week was stunning and totally out of the natural order of the gold/silver price manipulation scheme. It was a wowser! My smeller tells me, because the dramatic rally was so pronounced, that we are headed for some serious fireworks in the financial arena.

The Gold Cartel could be in deep trouble now because their honcho, JP Morgan, is in deepening trouble. This is no minor event in terms of the gold/silver market manipulation scandal.

All hands on deck to prepare for the financial market commotion that seems to be right around the corner!

Bill Murphy

Karzai "Thank You, U.S. Taxpayers for Supporting Us and the War in Afghanistan."


http://abcnews.go.com/politics/t/blogEntry?id=16390838

Did he really seriously say that?

I would like our elected officials to respond to this! 


What has the war in Afghanistan gotten us?  Besides the military making billions by smuggling in and keeping the heroin pipeline going!  


Oh, besides Afghanistan has major minerals in the country that could transform it into being one of the most important mining countries in the world.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/14/world/asia/14minerals.html?pagewanted=all

The previously unknown deposits — including huge veins of iron, copper, cobalt, gold and critical industrial metals like lithium — are so big and include so many minerals that are essential to modern industry that Afghanistan could eventually be transformed into one of the most important mining centers in the world, the United States officials believe.

An internal Pentagon memo, for example, states that Afghanistan could become the “Saudi Arabia of lithium,” a key raw material in the manufacture of batteries for laptops and BlackBerrys.

The vast scale of Afghanistan’s mineral wealth was discovered by a small team of Pentagon officials and American geologists. The Afghan government and President Hamid Karzai were recently briefed, American officials said.

 So is it any wonder that the U.S. will continue the "War on Terror" in Afghanistan so they can give all the big corporations control over the mining of the countries resources, besides continuing to protect the Poppy fields for heroin export?

Yet We the Tax Payers of the United States are suffering within the U.S. and 'supporting' Afghanistan at the same time.  We are losing our most valuable resources too.... the death of our soldiers due to the fake war there.

Wars are all about taking over resources of another country with made up excuses.

I am a Tax Payer and I DO NOT SUPPORT THE CONTINUED 10 YEAR OLD FAKE WAR ON TERROR IN AFGHANISTAN!

Karzai - You are NOT Welcome for our Tax Payer money supporting you and your country and the war that is costing us our citizen's lives and Trillions of our money!