Wednesday, November 27, 2013

The gun grabbers always say "Registration does not lead to Confiscation." Hmm... Seems New York is proving that WRONG - Confiscating weapons, registered in state. Letter proving it



Don't we all remember how Obama and all the gun grabbers say they want guns registered for 'our protection'.  Remember how they have all proclaimed "registration does not lead to confiscation"?

All of us who stand up for our 2nd amendment rights have shown the opposite is true in history.  Hitler confiscated all weapons registered.  Zimbabwe made everyone register their guns, then they confiscated them while killing all the people who had them.

Obama and all the gun grabbers said it would never happen in the U.S., they just want registration.

Well, it appears all of us were correct along with history.  New York state demands registration and now look what is happening there.  People who have registered their guns are now having them confiscated by the government.

Above is a letter sent out to a gun owner to confiscate their weapons in New York City, who had registered them. 

All I can say is, I joined the NRA for the first time after the Sandy Hook drill and I will make sure to renew my membership again.

They are not going to stop.   I have stated this a few times recently, they are starting the propaganda machine all over again.

If you think it is just a coincidence that the police report and the 911 calls are coming out right around the one year anniversary, then you don't understand how they work.   It is all part of the propaganda to keep Sandy Hook in the news for weeks before the one year anniversary and then the days of it.

When they begin talking about registration once more and how it does not lead to confiscation, just point out this letter in the U.S. for the confiscation of weapons that is happening now, due to registration of weapons! 

9 comments:

  1. Hitler did NOT confiscate guns!

    You're parroting the jew line. Do research.

    The Weimar Republic before him, restricted firearms, and in 1938, the law changing this was firmly in place: Allowing for firearms among the general citizenry.

    What you do NOT mention is that after the War -the Allies- all 3 of them - took the rights of owning guns away! Both West and East Germany. And the Soviets, that had taken the rights of owning them, right from the beginning, in Russia in 1917, took them from ALL the countries they overan....in E. Eur.

    How abou that?

    You didn't mention this, eh?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This Hitler confiscating guns nonsense is from the same source that created the 'It's for oil' bullshit and the Wmd's 'crap' No, the Nazis knew war was coming as soon as they started removing Germany from Jewish influence (especially the banking cartel) The Nazis encouraged people to train with firearms, including the Women-folk. Although Hitler wasn't too keen on animal hunting and there was six months hard labour in Dachau for people who broke the new animal protection legislation. Goering was a touchy subject as he loved deer hunting at Karin-hall, which Hitler was appalled by.
      As the Leftist scum entered Germany from the East in 1945 looking for women and girls to rape a fair few of the 'liberating' rapists were shot by the women trying to protect themselves.

      Ehrenberg, Stalin's odious, Jewish propaganda minister was baying: Kill, kill,kill brave Russian soldier, kill every German you see even if they are in their cradles.

      Delete
    2. To borrow from Mr. Cramer: "The laws adopted by the Weimar Republic intended to disarm Nazis and Communists were sufficiently discretionary that the Nazis managed to use them against their enemies once they were in power." In other words, they didn't need to pass additional laws. The Nazis did pass a weapons law in 1938, but that only added restrictions to the previous law, especially for Jews and other "non-citizens."

      Delete
  2. I believe that this confiscation issue applies only to residents of New York CITY. Residents of Free NY State, which thankfully does NOT include NY City have for years suffered from the rest of the nation lumping us all in with the travesty that is NY City. The rest of us as of this writing can still own 10rnd magazines tho we can only have 7rnds in them. Of course, this is just as stupid as it sounds. If we could only divorce ourselves from Albany. In your 'headline' you should specify the CITY as the problem here, and their restrictive regulations are decades old.

    ReplyDelete
  3. If your brain is the size of a nano particle, then you register your fire arm!

    ReplyDelete
  4. So you think just because it is a city, particularly New York City it is OK to violate the Constitution? To violate it in two ways. The SUPREMACY clause and the even SUPREMER natural rights to which much of the Constitution is based. The natural law of the right to SELF-DEFENSE which exceeds even the Constitution!

    Sheeple like you who continue to give in to these maligned traitors will soon be saying this is, baaaad, baaaad.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It is the Zionist (Ashkenazi "fake" Jews) parasites alone, the Synagogue of Satan, who are to blame for America and the rest of the worlds troubles. They have infiltrated every branch of our Gov. like disgusting parasites and their allegiance lies with their elite Zionist masters in Israel. At this point in time, they're attempting to disarm the American citizens for total control which will inevitably fall in line with their up and coming New (Jew) World Order.

    ReplyDelete
  6. If the govt. is going to try and disarm people, one of the first places they will look at is the NRA membership files along with the registered firearm files.

    ReplyDelete
  7. In America you have the Sandy-Hook farce and in Britain we have the Woolwhich nonsense to contend with. Both hoaxes, to be used to disarm and subdue the peoples. Only today the odious Theresa May is to introduce some more police-state laws to continue on the path to totalitarianism. These laws being known as the: 'anti-extremism plans' are to be discussed today. And, just by coincidence, as the farcical show trial at Woolwhich is taking place. Can you believe this: "There is also a suggestion that people who attempt to spread extremist views should be treated like those who indulge in anti-social behaviour."

    A blind man can see where this is going, surely!

    ReplyDelete