I LOVE DOING A HAPPY DANCE! :)
Banks are dropping foreclosure proceedings against people, themselves! MERS banks are walking away from mortgages and foreclosures as THEY DON'T WANT THE FIGHT!
Do you realize it means, those people are getting their homes and they will not be thrown out on the street!
This means THE PEOPLE ARE WINNING! YOU JUST HAVE TO STAND UP FOR WHAT IS RIGHT AND STAND UP AGAINST FRAUD!
From article:
Banks in recent weeks have been dropping hundreds of their Southwest Florida foreclosure lawsuits instead of facing defendants at trial, according to local attorneys and court records.
Now, everyone needs to be informed of the foreclosure fraud, most people still don't know about MERS foreclosures ARE Fraud!
Please help inform the public and those are risk of being foreclosed on!
Also, I have been calling and leaving messages with Universities, asking them to start class action suits against MERS. Have you? Please call law universities in your state and ask them to start class actions, just as the University of Maryland has done. Let them know the University of Maryland, got 10000 foreclosures thrown out, through their class action.
. . .
ReplyDeleteQuoting: "Banks in recent weeks have been dropping hundreds of their Southwest Florida foreclosure lawsuits instead of facing defendants at trial, according to local attorneys and court records."
+++++++++++++
Do you realize that when an attorney for a bank, goes into a court with a COPY of securities, (promissory note & mortgage agreement), and represents that such COPIES establish a valid claim to the right of enforcement of the ORIGINAL transaction, and the court rules on such bogus COPIES to the prejudice of the defendant, that such attorneys, as officers of the court, are actually committing “FRAUD UPON THE COURT!”
Read your state Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 11. The attorney, the attorney’s law firm, AND the bank (banksters), can be sanctioned with fines for such misrepresentations which caused the court to take some action in reliance upon the fraud.
In the Federal courts, the rules require you give the lying skunk attorney 21 days “safe harbor” to correct his incompetence, before filing the motion for Rule 11 sanctions with the clerk of court.
How protective attorneys are of one another. (A very close association). Its called the BAR. And, I call the attorneys “BAR-flys.”
When the BAR-flys realize the liabilities accruing to their misrepresentations in bogus foreclosure claims, it is no wonder that foreclosure actions are being withdrawn and dropped.
STANDING must be proved. If you have the time and inclination to do so, go to: http://nrgnair.com/MPT/zdi_tech/index.htm
Read --
Article: STANDING -- A CRITICAL ISSUE: The legal right to initiate a lawsuit
and
Article: STANDING -- A MEMORANDUM OF LAW
Lots of case law to make the point.
Attorneys are SCHOOLED in the law. Attorneys are supposed to KNOW ABOUT STANDING. Yet, they represent banksters in bogus foreclosure actions, situations where it is IMPOSSIBLE to establish a valid injury which would justify the claimed right to enforce an instrument in foreclosure.
If the banksters actually made a “loan,” where did the money come from that was “loaned”?
Who actually supplied the money?
The ramifications of the Federal Reserve banking scam is finally coming to the place where it may not be a good thing to a bankster or a a BAR-fly attorney that participated in the foreclosure scam.
People have been KILLED over the bogus taking of property scammed from them by the bankster’s money scam. The BAR-flys fully supported the bankster’s scam, and profited from it, at the expense and sometimes the lives of the people being scammed. (There is always a BAR-fly at the closing).
It is way past time to become knowledgeable about the bankster’s scam.
It is time to begin the accounting and atonement of the banksters and their BAR-flys.
. . .
. . .
ReplyDeleteRead this story and get the judgment here: http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/2011/01/21/next-in-the-massachusetts-pipeline-francis-j-bevilacqua-vs-pablo-rodriguez/
A "vulture" (BEVILACQUA, the plaintiff) swooped down to purchase a foreclosure property for a "song."
The bankster foreclosure, orchestrated by their BAR-flys, was invalid. That did not stop the banksters and their BAR-flys from selling the property to the "vulture" purchaser.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
THE TRIAL COURT
LAND COURT DEPARTMENT
FRANCIS BEVILACQUA, III v. PABLO RODRIGUEZ
MISC 10-427157
ESSEX, ss.
August 26, 2010
Long, J.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
The court kicked BEVILACQUA to the curb.
The court told BEVILACQUA he would have to get remedy from the bankster that defrauded him.
. . .
Do you know anyone winning in Idaho? I have been to several attorneys, and all say there is no hope here in a non-judicial review state. They auction my home in 6 weeks. We said "Show me the note" (with an attorney to do the request) and they ignored us. We quit paying, they will take this house and never have to show anyone a title. If we sue, we are liable for BofA's attorney fees, and our attorneys say we WILL lose. Got any connections that might make a happy dance for me, by any chance?
ReplyDeleteClaire, please email me
ReplyDeletesherriequestioningall at yahoo.com
Did you get my email?
ReplyDeleteNo I did not, Claire, please send it again. I don't know why not.
ReplyDeleteThanks