Chris Mercer "Media saying White Supremacist" Truth is Half Black, but not one single picture of his black mom taken.

The government and media has to stay by their 'created' dialog about Chris Mercer.  In fact there must be an unsaid pact to keep that narrative going.  Why, do I say that.  There are many pictures of Chris Mercer's white father but not one picture of his mother on the internet.  Why is that?  Because she is black.

The media headlines are "White Supremacist" leanings for the reason Chris Mercer did what he did.  Are people realizing that he targeted white Christians?

I have even had a family member call me and being upset what I wrote about in my questioning and red flag post about the shooting.   

That family member started yelling at me that Chris Mercer was white and that I needed to get my facts straight and that he was a Nazi White Supremacist.  Mind you, the family member believes the 'official 9/11' story and believes in gun control and that no one should have guns.  They only listen to the mainstream media and government narratives for everything.  So, needless to say, I know they are not really seeing the truth.

Search for an image of Chris Mercer's mother, you will only find one of his father.

Do a search with her name; Laurel Harper, Chris Harper Mercer's mother, for images, again all you get is images of Chris Harper and images of his father.  Not one single image of his mother.  The media is keeping that out of the public on purpose.

Do a search for Chris Mercer White Supremacist and you will find that is the headlines for many articles about the shooter.

The official narrative is; he was a white nazi loving right leaning shooter who killed Christians.  Yet, the first reports were that he was a Black Lives Matter Supporter.  

The official narratives include him being obsessed with guns.

I want to say, the media is not being honest at all by not showing his mother in images.  Chris Mercer was close to his mother.  He lived with her.

I have a real problem with the slanted information about the shooting.  The public is not being told the whole truth.  It is having to fit into a narrative that is contrived.  Is it any wonder I question every single thing that happens?  When I see we are not being given all the information about an event and people involved and things are being hidden, I then doubt all the facts.

I will say over and over again, the only reason we even have some form of freedoms still is the fact that we have a limited 2nd amendment still.  If our right to bear arms is taken away we will immediately lose every other free right we have left, which is not many.

Will an image of Chris Mercer's mother ever be released, or will she stay hidden from the public forever, so people don't question the 'White Supremacist' narrative?

I just want people to think for themselves about everything that happens. I want people to question everything released and look at what is not being released and then ask, Why?  I want people to start understanding we are being controlled to think one way about an event or situation by the government and media.  People need to start thinking for themselves, they need to read between the lines.  Don't just believe everything they are told.  I don't want people to just believe everything I write either.  As I can get things wrong too, though not on purpose, I try to put out the truth at all times.

The Oregon Shooting at Umpqua College. Here are some immediate red flag questions

  A Chris Mercer, 26 has been identified as the shooter at the Oregon Umpqua Community College

 I have some questions about this already.  

I don't think the media will lead with the fact the Oregon shooter was a "Black Lives Matter" supporter.  He was out to kill whites and Christians.  It does not fit their profiling they want, unlike how they unearthed a picture of the church shooter with a confederate flag a couple of months ago.  

“The shooter was lining people up and asking if they were Christian,” she wrote. “If they said yes, then they were shot in the head. If they said no, or didn’t answer, they were shot in the legs.

 He wrote about killing people at a school/college on a forum the night before.   It is completely disgusting how he was urged to do killings by others on the forum.  

Now the red flags and the questions I would like everyone to think about is the following from this article from the New York Post about the shooting. 

Sometime later, students’ cell phones were confiscated and they were escorted out of their buildings with their hands up as authorities patted them down and lined them up to be evacuated on buses, according to NRToday.

Now read this from the USA article about the shooting.

Hanlin, the Douglas County sheriff overseeing the investigation, has been vocal in opposing state and federal gun-control legislation.

Hanlin registered his opposition this year as state lawmakers considered requiring background checks on private, person-to-person gun sales.

Hanlin told a legislative committee in March that a background-check mandate wouldn't prevent criminals from getting firearms.

He said the state should combat gun violence by cracking down on convicted criminals found with guns, and by addressing people with unmanaged mental health issues.

Hanlin also sent a letter to Vice President Joe Biden in 2013, after the shooting at a Newtown, Connecticut, elementary school. Hanlin said he and his deputies would refuse to enforce new gun-control restrictions "offending the constitutional rights of my citizens."

First, WHY did they confiscate all the phones from the students that were in the college during the shooting?  I have never heard of phones being confiscated except when there are pictures and videos that authorities do not want made public.

Second,  It happened in the county where the sheriff there stands by the people's constitutional rights to bear arms and refused to enforce any gun control by the federal government.  Is that just a major coincidence?

I just think those two facts are very odd.  Of course this is going to be something that is jumped on by Obama, for gun control.  He has already made a speech about it.  But I seriously doubt he brought up the Black Lives Matter connection.  Of course if it had been someone who had been pictured with a confederate flag at one time, he would bring that up.

Information is still coming in about the shooting, but those are two things that really stood out to me after reading just those two articles too about it.  I wanted to bring those two oddities to people's attention.

I want to send my thoughts and condolences to all those who have been impacted and have lost their lives from this horrible and senseless tragedy.  No one should take another person's life.  I feel for the families involved.

I am not down playing what happened, I am simply asking questions about what I read and the things that don't make sense or is strange about it.  

Update:  The New York Post has now taken out the information about the cell phones being confiscated.  But I had pasted and copied what was written before.