Most important case ever - DOJ is Arguing to the Supreme Court - UN Treaties Trumps U.S. Constitution. Arguing against U.S. Sovereignty would essentially hand the U.S. over to the UN

We have entered very dangerous grounds.  The case the DOJ (Department of Justice) is arguing to the Supreme Court would in effect take away the Sovereignty of the United States and our laws.

The U.S. government is trying to argue that UN Treaties trumps and over rules the Constitution of the United States.

I want everyone to think about this.  It is very serious.  If the DOJ wins this case, the United States would essentially be a nation  under the rulings and laws of the UN.

This is not a joke and this is a back door forming the New World Order under the United Nations.

We would no longer have the rights to our local and state laws including the rights to Bear Arms.

Remember John Kerry signed the UN small arms treaty, which the Congress was against.  But he did it anyway.

We have people in the government that are giving away the country and every single right and law, we the U.S. citizens believe we live under.

Portion from article:

Justice Department attorneys are advancing an argument at the Supreme Court that could allow the government to invoke international treaties as a legal basis for policies such as gun control that conflict with the U.S. Constitution, according to Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas.
Their argument is that a law implementing an international treaty signed by the U.S. allows the federal government to prosecute a criminal case that would normally be handled by state or local authorities.

If the UN at any time wanted to abolish our 3 levels of government that could happen too.  We could immediately go into a complete dictatorship without a Congress.

I would hope the Supreme Court realizes they too could lose their jobs.  The Supreme legals decisions could become the 'World Courts' compared to our Supreme court.

For those that don't know.  The U.S. handed over our national parks to the UN already, though people do not know this.  They are considered UN Biospheres and World Heritage Centers. 

Our Sovereignty as a nation literally is in the Supreme Courts hands right this moment, with this administration arguing against our Sovereignty as a Nation and against our Constitution! 


Besides that Here is Obama's "behind the scenes working on gun control" solution. He shut down the last lead smelter manufacturing business in the U.S. Now the Small Arms treaty makes even more sense... all ammo controlled shipped from one country to another. All ammo will have to be made outside the U.S. now.

http://www.libertyfederation.com/have_we_had_an_endrun_around_the_2nd_amendment


A case in front of the Supreme court in 1957 was  Reid v Covert where the Supreme Court first ruled against the Constitution in regards to a foreign treaty signed by the Senate.  But it was petitioned for a re-hearing and changed their ruling for the Constitution. 

I do not have full faith in the Supreme Court to rule for our Constitution at this time due to the direction this country has been headed for the past few decades.  If they always ruled for the Constitution, then we would have a dollar backed by Gold and the Federal Reserve would not exist.  

UN about to take control of the Internet. Forget SOPA - this is international control - Forget Privacy - Seems "One World Government" is coming together.

With people all over the world standing up to the tyranny of the banks through all the governments and the information getting out to others around the world.... The governments want to stop the information. 
All the countries are actually ruled by the banks which are actually all owned by the same people.  So they are now consolidating the power into the UN, so they don't have the hassle of dealing with all the individual countries.  The UN is seriously about to be the "One World Government."

The UN is looking to be the "Police" of the internet with individual countries releasing their own control. 

On Feb. 27, a diplomatic process will begin in Geneva that could result in a new treaty giving the United Nations unprecedented powers over the Internet. Dozens of countries, including Russia and China, are pushing hard to reach this goal by year's end. As Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin said last June, his goal and that of his allies is to establish "international control over the Internet" through the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), a treaty-based organization under U.N. auspices.

• Subject cyber security and data privacy to international control;

• Allow foreign phone companies to charge fees for "international" Internet traffic, perhaps even on a "per-click" basis for certain Web destinations, with the goal of generating revenue for state-owned phone companies and government treasuries;

• Impose unprecedented economic regulations such as mandates for rates, terms and conditions for currently unregulated traffic-swapping agreements known as "peering."

• Establish for the first time ITU dominion over important functions of multi-stakeholder Internet governance entities such as the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, the nonprofit entity that coordinates the .com and .org Web addresses of the world;

• Subsume under intergovernmental control many functions of the Internet Engineering Task Force, the Internet Society and other multi-stakeholder groups that establish the engineering and technical standards that allow the Internet to work;

• Regulate international mobile roaming rates and practices.

This is why the Congress and Senate didn't care about the SOPA bill not getting through.  The UN will control the internet. 

It seems countries are now relinquishing individual sovereignty more and more to the UN.  They are even discussing having a "One World Court"  a "One World Regulatory Banking".

In other words the "One World Government" is coming together via the UN.

Is this why they will attack all countries that are not willing to be part of the "One World Government?"