Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Dave Hodges - Commonsense Show "Most Americans Will Submit to New World Order"

Dave Hodges has the Commonsense website and a radio show on Republican Broadcasting on Sunday nights.   He has interviewed me before on the show about the MERS Foreclosure Fraud.   He is the one who convinced me to write about my CPS experience.   We were discussing my first radio interview on the phone and I told him about the CPS coming to my home the month before.  I was not going to write about it as I did not want to jeopardize my losing my daughter, but he told me I had to.

Dave Hodges just wrote an article "Most Americans Will Submit to the New World Order."
He sent the article to me and I was surprised that a good portion is about me and two personal experiences  (CPS, Guidestones).   But it is ultimately about people needing to stand up together and if the government is allowed to take our guns then it is game over.  

He does have one bit wrong in that he says I am a  Red Cross Nurse, when I am simply a Red Cross Disaster Volunteer.   One other thing is my last name is used and I have always tried to protect that and have never used it on this site.  

The article is a very good one, because it is stating the truth and that is why I am reproducing it here. 

Just like I have been trying to get people to join together in unity and as a group to have a "show of force" against the government by people joining the NRA in mass." 

I believe in taking action because this is our last chance and if we sit back... then we will have Lost, it is only by becoming "one" in action and determination can we win.  

Dave Hodges has allowed me to reproduce the article here, but on his site he has videos and pictures etc. that I am not inserting here, including the CPS here at my house.

Article "Most Americans Will Submit to the New World Order":

As Feinstein, on behalf of Obama, continues her full frontal assault on the Second Amendment, Americans are being as united and as verbally defiant than at any time since the Tet Offensive in the Vietnam War era.

On the surface, it would appear that although our Second Amerndment is in jeopardy, at least our First Amendment rights are being fully exercised by a courageous American public who are finally standing up to the communist inspired tyranny coming out of the Whitehouse. At least, I wish that were true.
With cries that “The government will get my gun when they pry it out of my cold dead hand,” we should feel encouraged and emboldened. However, I am not optimistic. Americans have become weak, spineless and almost hopelessly dumbed down. When push comes to shove, I am afraid that most Americans will cower in the corner and give up their guns and any other rights to the criminal bankers that have hijacked our Republic. Speaking out carries risks, it is not for the faint of heart. There are real and significant consequences to speaking out as you try move people from the proverbial blue pill to the red pill.

Soon, most of us will have to decide, do we take the proverbial red pill, or continue taking the blue pill and roll over and go back to sleep and peacefully await the grim reaper courtesy of our global masters?

There are three distinct dangers facing every advocate for truth who dares to take the red pill. Please allow me to illustrate how dangerous it is to be an become an advocate for the truth, an advocate for justice and an advocate for real change.

 First, If you choose the red pill, you will be lonely beyond belief because all of your friends have taken the blue pill. You will be ridiculed by those who you thought cared for you.You will face such derision to the point that you will even question your own values, beliefs and even your sanity.

Second, if you choose the red pill, you will be ostracized by the purveyors of the matrix and their minions who dine on a steady diet of blue pills. As a result, you could lose your job, have your taxes audited and even be jailed. As in the case of Sherrie Wilcox, you could have your parental rights threatened and face losing your child. In the case of Stacy Lynne, you could actually lose your child for daring to speak out against governmental criminality.

Sherrie Wilcox took the red pill a long time ago and as a result, she became one of the poster children who serves to portray the victimization of middle class American parents by our now illegitimate government. At first glance, Sherry Wilcox appears to be an unassuming mom who would frequent her child’s soccer matches and accompany her sister to the local shopping mall. However, there is nothing average about Wilcox’s ability to research a topic and draw cogent conclusions as I have found her to be a courageous and gifted researcher whose blog contains some amazing information and photographs of The Georgia Guidestones, pictures of thousands of FEMA coffins as well as a stunning analysis of the previous deadly Ukrainian pneumonia with information that was largely unavailable in the main stream media (see Sherrie was one of the first in the country to expose the MERS fraud for what it truly was, the theft of our homes by the five megabanks.

Yet, for daring to exercise her First Amendment right to question the unconstitutional and illegal practices of the current federal government (e.g., mortgage fraud), Sherrie Wilcox received a visit from visit from Homeland Security, err….. The Child Protective Services (CPS). In the assumed defense of her child, the CPS officials accused Wilcox of mental abuse and the neglect of her child.
When I hear stories of abuse and neglect, I think of extreme physical discipline, starving children and the face of a child who is left alone to fend for themselves for long periods of time. Certainly, the investigation of Sherrie Wilcox’s fitness as a mother would have begun with an examination of these variables wouldn’t they? Well, not in this case. The Wilcox family ordeal began when Sherrie’s child was questioned at school without being advised that she had the right to have an advocate in the room with her at the time questioning. Further, the interrogation questions had nothing to with Sherrie Wilcox’s fitness as a mother as her child was asked the following questions:
(1) Does your mother take you camping?
(2) Where do you go camping?
(3) Who else goes camping with you?
(4) Does your mother store food?
(5) Does your mother have any guns?
(6) Has your mother remodeled your home?
(7) Does your mother have a safe room or a bomb shelter?
(8) Has your mother talked to you about the end of the world?
Being a former nationally certified mental health counselor who is intimately familiar with report requirements regarding child neglect and abuse, I fail to see the relevance of any of these questions regarding Sherrie Wilcox’s fitness as a parent and why any agency charged with protecting child welfare would be concerned about camping and storing food. These questions defy all legal precedent and common sense.

Upon returning home, the highly upset Wilcox child informed Sherrie about the intimidating interview and the unwarranted and intrusive nature of the questions that CPS officials asked the child at school. Wilcox promptly called CPS to inquire as to the motive behind subjecting her child to this extreme form of intimidation and mental abuse. The CPS official promptly informed her that they would be conducting an interview with her at her home in the morning. Sherrie Wilcox wisely arranged to have the ordeal videotaped by her sister and invited neighbors to witness this unique form of governmental intrusion of her parental rights.
After arriving at the Wilcox home,  CPS officials proceeded to ask Wilcox the following questions and levied the following accusations:
1. Does she have solar panels on her house?
2. How and where do the Wilcox’s go camping?
3. Does she store food? (Note: Sherrie Wilcox is a volunteer Red Cross nurse and her supplies are in accordance with FEMA guidelines).
4. Amazingly, CPS wanted to know if her house had an alternative heating source.
5. They also wanted to know if she had ever talked about the end of the world. (When the time is right, I hope Sherrie discusses the end of the American Republic with her child).
6. CPS accused Sherrie Wilcox of being in a “top secret” (unspecified) agency whose purpose is to overthrow the United States Government.
7. She was accused of blogging 20 hours per day and neglecting her child.
8. Finally, CPS wanted to know if she had committed the heinous parental act of renovating her house.
Partial video excerpts of these intrusive and illegal questions are posted below for all those who do not think that any CPS agent is intellectually deprived enough to ask such ridiculous questions.

Sherrie, her witnesses and her videographer intimidated the CPS into backing off. However, Stacy Lynne, from Fort Collins, was not so lucky.

Stacy Lynne also took the red pill years ago and subsequently is the other poster child of governmental abuse of power for daring to speak out against unjust policies in their community and their country. Five years ago, Stacy Lynne began making public presentations regarding the dangers of ICLEI. Lynne opposed the “greening” of downtown Ft. Collins which would have served to have financially destroyed the local business community in favor of ICLEI favored “green” businesses which would have taken more money out of local citizens pockets.

Lynne was successful in her efforts and defeated many of the Agenda 21 proposals for her community which has been under ICLEI rule for almost 18 years. For her trouble, Lynne became the victim of an intricate plot involving the Colorado’s governor’s office, local ICEI leaders and a very corrupt judge brought in from the World Bank to administer justice, Agenda 21 style. Agenda 21 justice, in Fort Collins, consists of the governmental abuse of power to steal the children of individuals who dare oppose the fascist Agenda 21 policies in their community. In Stacy Lynne’s case, this single mom had her child, Jaden, ripped away from custody without so much as one accusation of wrongdoing.
It is clear that CPS and their officials have been co-opted by Homeland Security to harass and profile innocent Americans who commit the unpardonable sin of speaking out against governmental wrongdoing.

As I mentioned, there are three dangers involved in taking the red pill. The third danger is that you could be murdered. Jeff Joe Black frequently called into my talk show. Some of his information was intriguing and I had several off-air conversations with him. At one point, Black was scheduled to be a guest on my talk show and but he cancelled at the last minute. Black informed me that he feared for his life and was going into hiding, which he subsequently did.

Earlier this year, Black resurfaced and contacted me. We spoke a couple of times about his appearing on my show to talk about Emanuel and his evil intentions towards Chicago. Why do I think that Black was on to something nefarious about Emanuel? Because Black appears to have been murdered this past October and his death is being investigated as a homicide.

Black had told me that we were going to see Chicago become the site of a massive false flag operation which will be the catalyst to martial law. This will follow a massive wave of house to house gun confiscations. It was Black’s contention that this was a lead up to the implementation of full-scale martial law. As an aside, here is a video of Black being arrested for protesting after he filed paperwork challenging Emanuel’s eligibility to run for mayor based upon this status of being a non-resident in Chicago. Jeff, may you rest in peace.

My black box warning label  for all of those who take the red pill, would be to caution all of you to carefully consider returning to your old life and keep ingesting your endless supply of blue pills courtesy of the mainstream media in order to perpetuate the illusion that has replaced America’s common sense. If you dare take the Red pill, please know there are very serious risks in speaking out, just ask Jeff Joe Black, Andrew Breitbart and Matt Simmons.

The sad part of American apathy is that those of us who dine exclusively on blue pills, will find no measure of protection from doing so, as we are all expendable. If America truly realized that submission will not bring security. Would you rather die on your feet or with a bullet to the back of the head?

You still have a choice, America, but that window is quickly closing for if the government gets our guns, it will be game over!


Personally I will keep being passionate and beg people to stand together!  I do sincerely believe when we stand together we show it is "WE THE PEOPLE"  and it will be the only way to make a difference.  We can not stand individually and be divided, it is only through a concerted action together we can make the difference in Unity and as One. 


  1. This is the failure of the positive liberty theory, that under the social contract we give up liberty in order to save society. From Daniel Bonevac's analysis of positive and negative liberty:

    "In Rousseau's social contact, then, we surrender everything but get everything back. We give up everything to the community but gain a full share in the results of cooperation and so end up with more than we had before. The general will is not what the community wants but what is in it's interests. The general will, that is, desires not what the community perceives as being in its interests but what is really in its interests. The general will, that is, is the common good. People may be ignorant or deceived; they may not know what is in their own interests. They may vote for a candidate or policy that fails to promote the common good. The vote in such a case does not reflect the general will."

  2. Hi Sherrie - my prayers go out to you. You are an amazing force, and intimidation like this makes it clear you are waking people up. Keep up the good fight for truth.

    I saw this quote on the Subsistence Pattern blog, and thought it very relevant to your situation. I notice how many of the questions they asked were designed to assess just how 'sustainable' or strong you really are. Stay strong and keep waking others up!

    "The tragic reality is that very few sustainable systems are designed or applied by those who hold power, and the reason for this is obvious and simple: to let people arrange their own food, energy and shelter is to lose economic and political control over them. We should cease to look to power structures, hierarchical systems, or governments to help us, and devise ways to help ourselves." - Bill Mollison