Sunday, April 17, 2011

Former Editor of Japan Times - Says Nuclear Bombs were being Built under Fukushima - Very Interesting Case Laid out

I have read at times about a nuclear bomb possibly being built under Fukushima Nuclear Power plant in Japan and pretty much disregarded them as simply "conspiracy" people were wanting to add to the melt down of the reactors.

I ignored many mentions of it until this morning.  An article caught my eye from Yoichi Shimatsu, who was the editor of Japan Times Weekly, on Global Research website.  

I had questioned myself and did not understand why Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant had just begun using Mox Fuel in reactor 3 this last September (2010) when the Nuclear Power plant was going to be completely taken off line this month (April 2011) and the plant was going to be decommissioned.  Something bothered me about TEPCO bringing in the most toxic substance known to man (MOX fuel - with plutonium) for such a short amount of time of use.  It did not make sense, for them to bring in fuel rods that stay hot for years even after a reactor is taken off line...... why do that? 

Yoichi Shimatsu, puts it together where it makes sense and yes it weaves what many would call conspiracies, but remember conspiracy is only that until it is proven.  Time and time again, conspiracies have been proven to actually be truth in the world history. 

Portions of Article:  (go to link to read full article - very interesting information)

A fire ignited inside the damaged housing of the Unit 4 reactor, reportedly due to overheating of spent uranium fuel rods in a dry cooling pool. But the size of the fire indicates that this reactor was running hot for some purpose other than electricity generation. Its omission from the list of electricity-generating operations raises the question of whether Unit 4 was being used to enrich uranium, the first step of the process leading to extraction of weapons-grade fissionable material.

The bloom of irradiated seawater across the Pacific comprises another piece of the puzzle, because its underground source is untraceable (or, perhaps, unmentionable). The flooded labyrinth of pipes, where the bodies of two missing nuclear workers—never before disclosed to the press— were found, could well contain the answer to the mystery: a lab that none dare name.

Cut Off From Communications
The substance of undisclosed talks between Tokyo and Washington can be surmised from disruptions to my recent phone calls to a Japanese journalist colleague. While inside the radioactive hot zone, his roaming number was disconnected, along with the mobiles of nuclear workers at Fukushima 1 who are denied phone access to the outside world. The service suspension is not due to design flaws. When helping to prepare the Tohoku crisis response plan in 1996, my effort was directed at ensuring that mobile base stations have back-up power with fast recharge.

A subsequent phone call when my colleague returned to Tokyo went dead when I mentioned "GE.” That incident occurred on the day that GE’s CEO Jeff Immelt landed in Tokyo with a pledge to rebuild the Fukushima 1 nuclear plant. Such apparent eavesdropping is only possible if national phone carrier NTT is cooperating with the signals-intercepts program of the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA).

On his 1959 visit to Britain, Kishi was flown by military helicopter to the Bradwell nuclear plant in Essex. The following year, the first draft of the U.S.-Japan security was signed, despite massive peace protests in Tokyo. Within a couple of years, the British firm GEC built Japan's first nuclear reactor at Tokaimura, Ibaragi Prefecture. At the same time, just after the 1964 Tokyo Olympics, the newly unveiled Shinkansen train gliding past Mount Fuji provided the perfect rationale for nuclear-sourced electricity.

Kishi uttered the famous statement that "nuclear weapons are not expressly prohibited" under the postwar Constitution's Article 9 prohibiting war-making powers. His words were repeated two years ago by his grandson, then Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. The ongoing North Korea "crisis" served as a pretext for this third-generation progeny of the political elite to float the idea of a nuclear-armed Japan. Many Japanese journalists and intelligence experts assume the secret program has sufficiently advanced for rapid assembly of a warhead arsenal and that underground tests at sub-critical levels have been conducted with small plutonium pellets.
Meanwhile in 2009, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) issued a muted warning on Japan's heightened drive for a nuclear bomb— and promptly did nothing. The White House has to turn a blind eye to the radiation streaming through American skies or risk exposure of a blatant double standard on nuclear proliferation by an ally. Besides, Washington's quiet approval for a Japanese bomb doesn't quite sit well with the memory of either Pearl Harbor or Hiroshima.
In and of itself, a nuclear deterrence capability would be neither objectionable nor illegal— in the unlikely event that the majority of Japanese voted in favor of a constitutional amendment to Article 9. Legalized possession would require safety inspections, strict controls and transparency of the sort that could have hastened the Fukushima emergency response. Covert weapons development, in contrast, is rife with problems. In the event of an emergency, like the one happening at this moment, secrecy must be enforced at all cost— even if it means countless more hibakusha, or nuclear victims.

Instead of enabling a regional deterrence system and a return to great-power status, the Manchurian deal planted the time bombs now spewing radiation around the world. The nihilism at the heart of this nuclear threat to humanity lies not inside Fukushima 1, but within the national security mindset. The specter of self-destruction can be ended only with the abrogation of the U.S.-Japan security treaty, the root cause of the secrecy that fatally delayed the nuclear workers' fight against meltdown.

Yoichi Shimatsu who is Editor-at-large with the 4th Media is a Hong Kong–based environmental writer. He is the former editor of the Japan Times Weekly. This article is first appeared in the New American Media.

3 comments:

  1. All fuel rods stay hot for years after taken off line. There is no safe nuclear power.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The United States is a federal corporation.
    Legal definition by the U.S. CODE (15) “United States” means—
    (A) a Federal corporation;
    (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
    (C) an instrumentality of the United States.

    http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/usc_sec_28_00003002----000-.html

    The corporate-government matrix is global, deceptive, destructive and must end!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Sherrie!

    I linked to one of your other posts over at my blog.

    But speaking on the topic of Japan and nuclear weapons. You may be interested in a post I did on this topic, with lots of additional information based around the story you have used.

    You may be really surprised

    http://pennyforyourthoughts2.blogspot.com/2011/04/like-israel-japan-is-nuclear-power.html

    ReplyDelete