Thursday, July 17, 2014

What is wrong with these pictures? Malaysia Airlines MH-17 crash site compared to United 93 crash site in Shanksville.

Shanksville site

Ukraine site

UPDATE 7/18/14:  Ukraine was in charge of MH17 - had them go through war zone, different route than normal and had them fly lower than they requested.

I just want to point out the obvious.





More articles about MH17 I have posted:



Hacked emails calling for False Flag in Ukraine so U.S. can act against Russia

Update 7/21 - Russia PROVING Ukraine shot down plane through satellite images http://sherriequestioningall.blogspot.com/2014/07/russia-proving-ukraine-shot-down-mh17.html

Bombshell - Air Traffic Controller in Kiev said Ukrainian military shot down plane

Absolute Reason why the U.S. could have been behind the shooting down of MH17
http://sherriequestioningall.blogspot.com/2014/07/absolute-reason-why-us-would-be-behind.html

Missile Guidance system intercepted in Finland going to Ukraine from Vietnam

Ukraine routed MH 17 through War Zone, not normal route and had them fly lower than they requested

No other countries are blaming Russia for MH17 except the U.S., U.K. and Australia

6 comments:

  1. As others have pointed out the MH17 crashed almost intact. Hence a missile hit is not implicated/is impossible. Another Laser take down?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A direct hit doesn't always mean a physical hit. The missile could have exploded in front of the plane and shrapnel taken in by the engines could have exploded the engines or just turned them into useless anchors.

      Delete
    2. Ukranian pilot admits to shooting down plane with machine gun on board jet.
      Google translate:

      Eventually, the pressure was too great. The pilot of the Ukrainian Su-25, which was shown in the presentation of the Russian General Staff, admitted yesterday to have the plane shot flightless with his cannon. Coincidentally to the crashed Boeing photos were shown the clear bullet holes from machine gun bullets contained, which consistently showed a frontal angle and hardly could result from Buk missile. In many pro-Russia hacks in the forums and comment columns of the Internet this confession came on relief. A small victory for Putin understanders that so far unsuccessfully tried to flood the Internet with their facts.

      Delete
  2. Sherrie - Interesting you would put these two 'airline' stories together. I'm curious if we put two other airline stories together, namely MH17 and MH370?

    What are the odds of 2 Malaysian Airlines planes, both 777's, ending under mysterious circumstances in such a short time? Maybe there's a connection.

    What if the vanished MH370 was 'worked on' to drone up it's autopilot system, relabeled as MH17, then sent to Ukraine to try and get a war started, after they failed so miserably in getting one stirred up in Syria and people saw through it?

    Might just be a wild coincidence, but it's also possible we found the missing plane, driven by psychopaths intent on getting us involved in another profitable (for them) war.

    ReplyDelete
  3. United 93 didn't crash into that small hole. It is impossible for an aircraft to reach the speeds necessary to vaporize upon impact. The speeds would have torn the aircraft apart, and then the bulk of what is left, would have slow dramatically. Compare the B737 that crashed due to the Hard Over problems Boeing had. You're welcome.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nice, i love your comparison, dead on!!! No pun

    ReplyDelete