Obama and Boehner meeting privately for "Fiscal Cliff" resolutions. Let's discuss... 2 men deciding U.S. future? Entitlements, what they are and are not. History: Banks entitled not people.

Over and over again we are hearing the words "Fiscal Cliff."   So funny how those words sprang up immediately after the election.  Yet during debates and pre-election coverage those two words were not formed together and that was less than one month ago.   Now all we hear are those two words in the media and from the government. 

We are hearing how Obama and Boehner are meeting in private to hammer out a resolution of the "Fiscal Cliff."

One side wants entitlement cuts and the other side wants raised taxes from what we hear.

Well lets first get one thing straight.  There are not really "two sides" there is one game being played with two teams that are stationed as "players" for the public.   The two teams are there to divide the public that is watching the game.  But when the public is not viewing the inside players lounge, they are not seeing how those two teams are actually one, the drama is just for show.   It is just like wrestling or a reality show.  It is all set up just for the "drama and show" of it. 

I have said this over and over again.  The left and right are there to make sure the public/citizens are divided and hate each other for what side they are on.   This way they get away with whatever they want to do.

Even the USA Wrestling organization has created a logo that shows the country divided with red and blue.  Yet wrestling is a laid out planned "who will win and who will lose" sport/game.   Doesn't that tell you something right there?  Can't you see it.....



Haven't you ever noticed no matter how much yelling and screaming ahead of any government laws to be voted on the "two teams" always get together and vote against the American public and do what is worst for the public?   Just think about past bills..... NDAA (govt. can kill/detain U.S. citizen on U.S. soil or anywhere now), Stimulus (2009), Bank bailout (TARP), etc.

Remember how much yelling and screaming of those bills, there was ahead of time by both "teams", yet all the team players on both sides came together to  push them through.

So be sure to understand that these "Fiscal Cliff" talks between Boehner and Obama are just for the game of it.  

But lets discuss that portion of the "game."   How in the hell did we get to this point of the "game" in allowing it to be between 2 men only?  How did we get to this point in allowing our future to be determined by 2 people that will affect 350 million?  

Let's think about that one.  Have we, "the public"  accepted that the game can be played on a micro level now that it is between 2 people to figure out?   NO, I don't believe we have!  I don't believe that we have as of yet allowed such a dictatorship to have that power (but we are close).

Now... all the media is throwing around the word "entitlements" once more in regards to the "fiscal cliff."   They are saying how entitlements to the public need to be cut.  

Last year I wrote about "Entitlements" and what they are and they are not!

Here is a little from that article - but I highly advice reading it for those who may not fully understand what Social Security is and how it is funded.  I have the history of it in the article.

BTW - from Social Security's website itself - shows  it has made 2+ TRILLION Dollars in excess than what it has ever paid out!

Every single person in the U.S. who works and gets a pay check are paying into Social Security.  Then on top of that all the money you paid into Social Security over the year you still have to pay full taxes on, even though the government took it for your "own good".  

Social Security was started in the 1935 by Roosevelt (yeah the same one of the Bretton Woods agreement and let the banks run wild and confiscated all the gold).   I am sure it was simply another way to get people's money out of their pockets and sold as a retirement nest egg that the government was going to keep safe for them.

Social Security is NOT a paid out benefit that comes from the government and has to be budgeted in!  It is it's own program that people are required by law to pay into.  It is NOT I repeat NOT an entitlement from the Government!

 
People need to fully understand it and educate themselves and not just allow the controlled mass media educate them. 

BUT now let's discuss what entitlements are and who are getting entitlements........

Question.... Who has gotten "free money" and has not had to pay a dime into a program to get that money over the last few years?

Let's think about that one.... including how the Federal Reserve had hidden trillions (16) in bailouts for the banks during the TARP time.  

So WHO is actually getting money and not having their taxes raised?  Figure it out yet?

Banks not paying back TARP money.  (This doesn't include the 16 trillion secretly/freely given out)

Fed audit reveals 16 Trillion secretly given to banks.

GE was given 140 billion in money (yep owns NBC and big media)
But what is even more infuriating about it all????  GE doesn't pay any taxes!  Outragous!

In fact you will find that all these banks and big corporations that get entitlements of Free money from the government and all of us... don't pay taxes! 

Yet... the media and the "game" of "Fiscal Cliff" that is being played is to stop the money that we have to pay into Social Security and Medicaid, etc... PLUS pay higher taxes. 

So... lets go over this....

Banks and corporations get entitlements and trillions of free money, they don't pay back and they don't have to pay taxes.  The government doesn't go after them nor do they hold them accountable.

Citizens of the United States that toil hard to pay their bills and not get kicked out on the street through foreclosure fraud of the banks and to keep their utilities on... besides having to pay into Social Security and other "entitlements" every pay check... are the ones the focus is on to cut the amount they get from what they have had to pay into AND get their taxes raised.

OH... what a country we live in!  Yet, people are not screaming and yelling about this.

Where is the critical thinking where is the common sense of Americans today?  

Why aren't people standing up and asking questions?

Do people really think the government (puppets) officials in Washington D.C. still work for the public's best interest?   They must, because they keep putting the same puppets back in office. 

When will people wake up to the game? 

The reality is... this "cliff" is not a fiscal cliff but it is a constitution cliff that we are at.  We are at the edge of allowing this country to go over the side of Democracy and become a dictatorship by allowing more control in fewer and fewer hands.  Now it is in the hands of two.

WOW.... I really didn't know when I became "awoke" that I would see the rest of the citizens being string pulled and led into the directions that are happening.  I didn't know that people would rather accept lies to what really is then to educate themselves on what is truth (which is not what MSM broadcast). 

So.... does in anyone really think this "Fiscal Cliff" game will end up with an advantage to the people... or the advantage to the banks and corporations?

Oh, one other thing that has outraged me..... those top CEO's of banks and corporations calling for "entitlement" cuts for the public....... 

Yeah... believe it or not.... small portion from article:

WASHINGTON -- The corporate CEOs who have made a high-profile foray into deficit negotiations have themselves been substantially responsible for the size of the deficit they now want closed.

The companies represented by executives working with the Campaign To Fix The Debt have received trillions in federal war contracts, subsidies and bailouts, as well as specialized tax breaks and loopholes that virtually eliminate the companies' tax bills.

The CEOs are part of a campaign run by the Peter Peterson-backed Center for a Responsible Federal Budget, which plans to spend at least $30 million pushing for a deficit reduction deal in the lame-duck session and beyond. 

During the past few days, CEOs belonging to what the campaign calls its CEO Fiscal Leadership Council -- most visibly, Goldman Sachs' Lloyd Blankfein and Honeywell's David Cote -- have barnstormed the media, making the case that the only way to cut the deficit is to severely scale back social safety-net programs -- Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security -- which would disproportionately impact the poor and the elderly. 

As part of their push, they are advocating a "territorial tax system" that would exempt their companies' foreign profits from taxation, netting them about $134 billion in tax savings, according to a new report from the Institute for Policy Studies titled "The CEO Campaign to ‘Fix’ the Debt: A Trojan Horse for Massive Corporate Tax Breaks" -- money that could help pay off the federal budget deficit.

Yet the CEOs are not offering to forgo federal money or pay a higher tax rate, on their personal income or corporate profits. Instead, council recommendations include cutting "entitlement" programs, as well as what they call "low-priority spending."

So... do you see who is actually entitled in this country and who is not?

CNBC - Saying Gold going to $2500 because Entitlements not Cut

Right now a CNBC analyst from JP Morgan is saying Gold is on the way to $2500, because the U.S. entitlements are not being cut.

What absolute Bull Shit!

All the media keeps saying Social Security is an entitlement, they really have people brainwashed in thinking that.   That fact is False and a Lie!  Social Security is not and has NEVER been an entitlement.  It is not a giveaway from the government.

I wrote about this during the debt ceiling debate.

That article is here.

Social Security is not an entitlement

I am wondering if JP Morgan has lost control of their manipulation of gold due to all that is happening and that is why they are now saying Gold is going to $2500?  They are definitely working on silver and have not yet lost control there, but I would suspect at some point in the near future they will lose control there too.  But when/if Bernanke announces a QE3 then JP Morgan will be given the billions they need to keep the prices low and suppressed. 

UPDATE - They have been talking about Gold for an hour now - why are they now admitting it is the place to be?  This is against all their rules of gold coverage being allowed by the government.  The fact gold is the safe haven, means bonds and stocks are not.  It is not an area the government wants focused on.  I assume the natural demand for gold and it's rising against all the forces against it, they can not ignore gold anymore.
I think I can hear the Comex cracking as demand increases. 

Washington Journal - Social Security is very well funded - Peter Coy of Bloomberg calls it an entitlement and says cuts need to be made - but is set straight by truth in Video!

Video Washington Journal with Peter Coy of Bloomberg Business week - start at the 28 minute mark.

Also see this Bloomberg article saying: "Social Security will run out sooner than expected" - Look at the date of Social Security running out: 2037!!!  All the fear mongering over social security by MSM and the government is ridiculous - expect them trying to brainwash everyone into thinking it is a "giveaway by the government"! 

Peter Coy begins stuttering when the anchor Susan Swain, says "Social Security is well funded and has trillions in excess".

He does not know what to say and then at the 31 minute mark, he says he will have to look into it.

He calls Social Security an entitlement.

Which I had posted and wrote about, informing everyone Social Security is NOT an entitlement.

The part that is important about Social Security starts at 28 minutes of this video.

Peter Coy had been saying Social Security cuts were needed, but Swain informed him it was well funded, that is when he began stuttering and trying to get around the facts.

Transcript of part that is important about Social Security with Peter Coy

SWAIN:  Let me turn from that to the thesis of your cover story, which is "Why the Debt Crisis is Even Worse Than You Think." It's accompanied by this chart or graphic which I'd like to put on the screen which is the debt deluge in which you show what everyone is talking about and what everyone should be talking about which is the fiscal gap  what's this all about


COY: Fiscal gap is a different way of measuring out problems Everyone focuses on the national debt..which of course is important to focus on but, the national debt is backward looking  it tells you what's obligations have already accumulated

What it doesn't tell you fully is the debt to come..or the obligations we are incurring now based on the way we've created formulas for social security, medicare and medicaid. If you look at those and you go out into the indefinite future.to make sure that there's not some kind of accounting problem on the distant horizon..you find that the gap...between everything we expect to receive --tax revenue-- and everything we expect to spend is $211 trillion ...trillion dollars...stated in today's dollars


SWAIN:  So, what does Washington do with that?


COY: Well, what you do is what people have been talking about doing.  You've got to tackle the entitlements because that's by far the bulk of the problem. Entitlements of course being social security and medicare. You also have to tackle medicaid. You also have to deal with the outlying years. You have to create formulas that will be sustainable.  And you have to figure out how to something about with healthcare costs which are rising at a rate that's unsustainable, presumably by changing the incentives. This has been said on C-Span and elsehwere but it's not just talk it's like the economists that look at the longterm future say if that doesn't happen things just kind of blow up. Even 212 trillion wouldn't be enough.


SWAIN:  Well one thing just to note..as you're saying Social Security is part  of the solution....In this illustration you have here...social security...taxes... let's see.one side is revenue and one side is debt.  It shows social security in a surplus. Right.  132 in what is receives versus 110  trillion?  Am I reading that correctly? [Coy responds, "Yeah."] So, people who social security be set aside we've paid into it it's really solvent for right now. Why should that be part of the discussion?
  The left side of the chart (debt) reads, "Social Security $110 tn." The right side (receipts) reads "Social Security taxes $132 tn."


COY:  That 's a good point. The social security numbers...the trust fund is not the crucial issue.  That's why people say that medicare is where the bigger problem...but,  social security...um...[is] probably going to have to have a higher...um...retirement age..but, you know...funny thing...I think that's a good point you're making there. I'm going to go back and look at that more closely for next week's story.

Notice Coy began back tracking on Social Security acting like he had no clue about it!

EVERYONE STAND UP FOR WHAT IS RIGHT - SOCIAL SECURITY IS NOT AN ENTITLEMENT IT IS WELL FUNDED!  DO NOT LET THE GOVERNMENT TWIST IT IN YOUR MIND IN THINKING IT IS AN ENTITLEMENT!  LET YOUR GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS KNOW THAT YOU KNOW SOCIAL SECURITY IS WHAT WE PAY FOR DIRECTLY!

My Video about Social Security NOT being an Entitlement or Giveaway from the Government!

I felt the need to get a video done, so others who may not read the information can at least hear it.

Link to my full post about social security NOT being an Entitlement! 

Social Security is NOT An Entitlement from the Government - Contrary to the Propaganda MSM and the Government are Spewing right now! Here are the FACTS about Social Security!

Update 7/30/11 - Washington Journal Interview - Peter Coy of Bloomberg Business Week caught and set straight when trying to say Social Security is an entitlement and underfunded.

I keep reading and hearing all the propaganda even on alternative news sites about the Debt Ceiling and Social Security being affected if the debt ceiling is not raised!

Well let me give you an education!

SOCIAL SECURITY IS NOT AN ENTITLEMENT FROM THE GOVERNMENT!!!

No matter how much MSM and the Government have twisted it over the years for people to think it is an entitlement it is NOT!

BTW - from Social Security's website itself - shows  it has made 2+ TRILLION Dollars in excess than what it has ever paid out!

Every single person in the U.S. who works and gets a pay check are paying into Social Security.  Then on top of that all the money you paid into Social Security over the year you still have to pay full taxes on, even though the government took it for your "own good".  

Social Security was started in the 1935 by Roosevelt (yeah the same one of the Bretton Woods agreement and let the banks run wild and confiscated all the gold).   I am sure it was simply another way to get people's money out of their pockets and sold as a retirement nest egg that the government was going to keep safe for them.

Social Security is NOT a paid out benefit that comes from the government and has to be budgeted in!  It is it's own program that people are required by law to pay into.  It is NOT I repeat NOT an entitlement from the Government!

Understand how the Propaganda is working right now in the government and media.  Obama has threatened that Social Security checks won't go out on Aug 3rd if the debt ceiling is not raised!

Well let me tell you.... he has no right to threaten that!  Social Security is not at all hinged into the debt, except for the fact that other government entities have raided Social Securities money and has not paid it back!  We the people have had our money raided in every single way even our retirement money which we have been forced to pay has been taken by the government and spent on war and given to the banks.

Here are Facts about Social Security from U.S. government sites!  These are not "alternative news/blogs" this is the U.S. government saying exactly where Social Security money comes from. 

Here are some links with Facts

http://ssa-custhelp.ssa.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/200

Participating in the Social Security program

Updated 06/01/2011 05:31 PM   |   ID# 200 

Am I required to participate in the Social Security program?

Participation in the Social Security program is mandatory with respect to the payment of Social Security taxes. Unless specifically exempt by law, everyone working in the United States is required to pay Social Security taxes on earnings from employment. These earnings are subject to Social Security tax without regard to the citizenship or place of residence of either the employer or the employee.
The authority for the collection of taxes, including Social Security taxes, is found in the Internal Revenue Code, not the Social Security Act. (See sections 3101(a) and 3102(a) of the Code.) We suggest that you direct any questions you may have about tax liability to the Internal Revenue Service for consideration. The address is:
Internal Revenue Service
1111 Constitution Avenue NW
Washington, D.C. 20224.

http://ssa-custhelp.ssa.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/435/related/1

Can I opt out of paying Social Security taxes or withdraw taxes I paid for Social Security coverage?

Social Security coverage is mandatory.

The law also does not permit a refund of Social Security taxes. The authority for the collection of taxes, including Social Security taxes, is published in the Internal Revenue Code, not the Social Security Act. (See sections 3101(a) and 3102(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.)  Please direct any questions you may have about tax liability to the Internal Revenue Service at the address below:

Internal Revenue Service
1111 Constitution Avenue NW
Washington, D.C. 20224.

http://ssa-custhelp.ssa.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/493/related/1

Do I have to pay income taxes on the benefits I receive?

You will have to pay federal taxes on your Social Security benefits if you file a federal tax return as an individual and your total income is more than $25,000.  If you file a joint return, you will have to pay taxes if you and your spouse have a total income of more than $32,000.

Use the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Notice 703 shown on the back of the Social Security Benefit Statement, SSA Form 1099, to determine if any of your benefits may be taxable.

Social Security has no authority to withhold state or local taxes from your benefit.  Many states and local authorities do not tax Social Security benefits.  However, you should contact your state or local taxing authority for more information.

http://www.socialsecurity.gov/history/hfaq.html

Q24:  How much has Social Security paid out since it started?
A:  From 1937 (when the first payments were made) through 2009 the Social Security program has expended $11.3 trillion.
(See detailed tables of annual Social Security payments 1937-2008.) (See also detail for Q26)

---

Q25:  How much has Social Security taken in taxes and other income since it started?
A:  From 1937 (when taxes were first collected) through 2009 the Social Security program has received $13.8 trillion in income.

http://www.socialsecurity.gov/history/tftable.html
pay out table!

 (Only non-government site linked in regards to information)

http://money.howstuffworks.com/personal-finance/financial-planning/social-security.htm

Where Does the Money Come From?

As of June 2005, 6.2 percent of a worker's wages are diverted into the Social Security trust funds (one for retirement benefits and one for disability). Employers put in an additional 6.2 percent, resulting in a total payroll tax of 12.4 percent. Self-employed workers pay all 12.4 percent themselves. Income greater than $90,000 is not subject to Social Security taxation -- this is known as the "maximum amount."

 it means that you are paying a certain percentage of your salary into the Social Security system -- and the idea is that you will get this money back once you retire so you have some extra money to live on once you stop receiving your paycheck.

So - Understand and stop thinking the Government is "giving away money in an entitlement" to the people!  WE the People are the ones who have paid the money to Social Security!

OH, you want to know the funniest part of Social Security???

When FDR enacted Social Security, he put the retirement age and ability to get Social Security benefits at 65.  Well guess what............... at that time in the 1930s, the expected life span of people was under 65!

So, who was he enacting Social Security benefits being taken out of your pay for retirement, in reality (banks?)?  Just makes you laugh once you learn that history is not all it has been made out to be.

Here is that information from the government themselves:

http://www.socialsecurity.gov/history/lifeexpect.html

If we look at life expectancy statistics from the 1930s we might come to the conclusion that the Social Security program was designed in such a way that people would work for many years paying in taxes, but would not live long enough to collect benefits. Life expectancy at birth in 1930 was indeed only 58 for men and 62 for women, and the retirement age was 65.

 Stop thinking it is a Give Away from the Government!  It is NOT - it is in fact a program that lets the government get more of the people's money!  

UPDATE 10pm est 7/25/11 - Huffington post a alternative news site is touting that Social Security is an Entitlement to the people of the U.S.!!!  Man that Tees me off!  The article is saying Reid's plan will leave all entitlements in place, including Social Security!  What a Crock - that is how twisted the government and the media has made social security, as if it is an entitlement to the people!  They forget to say - that it is a TAX that everyone has to pay and it is our own money we start getting back at age 65!  

Update 7/26/11 - Video I did about Social Security not being an entitlement

Do U.S. Government Agencies Even Talk to Each other and Share information? The Fed WANTS inflation - Purchasing 1.7 Trillion of U.S. Bonds/t-bills - YET the Agency for Social Security NO COLA increase! What Complete B.S.! China releases Angriest Statement Yet, against U.S. monetary practices! Included is VideoTrailier for "End of Liberty"

The U.S. government is NOT increasing Social Security YET AGAIN for 2011, they did not Increase it for 2010 either.  I had posted about this the other day!  They are saying NO Inflation - which is Complete Bullshit!  They are using big ticket items, cars, T.V.'s, etc.. as the majority of the "no Inflation", because those have been steady in prices, as NO ONE is Buying big ticket items... so of course they go Down in Price!

BUT FOOD, GAS, UTILITY BILLS HAVE INCREASED DRAMATICALLY Since Last Year!  Food they are saying has not really increased - BUT they are NOT taking into account that food items purchased have been halved in amount so the price can stay the same.  So in reality, Food has DOUBLED IN PRICE!  Gas last year was around $1.70 - this year it is One dollar MORE, Utility bills have increased at Least 10 to 20% than last year.   I have been watching all the REAL COST OF LIVING Go up and up and up!

What I have a real problem with too, is The Fed is saying THEY WANT INFLATION!  They may say 1.7 to 2% But we know, as they purchase the U.S. bonds and keep creating Trillions out of paper, they are printing 24/7, which is also known as the U.S. dollar... it will NOT just be a max of 2%. 

Lets talk what Reality is... Reality is China is getting more and more Upset!  They are voicing and releasing their negative opinions more and more.  If you are aware how China works.... they keep things to themselves and do on publicize it, until they have taken action.  Look at the Gold they admitted to acquiring, years after they purchased it.  They did not want gold to start going up, so they did not release the fact they had been purchasing it UNTIL after they had gotten a few hundred tons.  They are voicing more and more, how angry they are with the U.S.

China just came out with this Unbelievable Statement "The U.S.'s Currency War isTomb Maker"

Portion

Chinese leaders have warned before that loose monetary policies in the United States pose a serious challenge for emerging markets, but rarely in such strident language, a window onto the rising anger in Beijing.

"The dollar's depreciation may appear to be market-driven. In reality, it is a depreciation coloured by very strong, deliberate actions," Li said in the paper, which serves as the chief mouthpiece of China's ruling Communist Party.

Does everyone understand that statement!  That is a point blank - SHOT AGAINST THE U.S. BOW BY CHINA! They are saying directly!  "You Will Go Down" by starting this currency war they are determined to.

At least Geithner did not make his little announcement on Friday, that was expected to say "China is a currency manipulator"!  He is going to wait until after the next G20 meeting. 

HOW DID WE GET SO FAR DOWN THIS RABBIT HOLE?  WE AS CITIZENS HAVE NOT PAID ATTENTION, INSTEAD WE WATCH STUPID MEANINGLESS SHOWS ON T.V., WE ARE DRUGGED IN OUR WATER, WE HAVE LET WASHINGTON RUN WILD AND TRANSFER POWER FROM BEING "WE THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE" GOVERNMENT TO "WE THE CORPORATIONS AND BANKS AND ALL LAWS FOR THE CORPORATIONS AND BANKS, SCREW THE PEOPLE"!  THAT IS REALITY!


OUR REALITY SUCKS NOW...... WE ALLOWED THIS TO HAPPEN!!   QUESTION - WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO ABOUT IT NOW?  BESIDES PEOPLE NEEDING TO WAKE UP!

End of Liberty Movie Trailer:

Wall Street Banks DeFrauding the People with MERS AND U.S. Government DeFrauding the People - NO Inflation/ Living Expense Increase for Social Security Recipents for 2nd Year - YET Congress and Senate RAISES Their Pay for Living Expense Increase!

NO Inflation/ Living Expense Increase for Social Security Recipents for 2nd Year - YET Congress and Senate RAISES Their Pay for Living Expense Increase!

I had posted about the Government Officials Raising their own salaries, while those on Social Security were Screwed last year due to not getting an inflation adjusted increase.  BUT I never dreamed that once again the government would NOT increase the social security for those who NEED it the most!  I am sickened with what is happening!  How is it, THE PEOPLE don't get an increase for the cost of living YET the Government officials do?!  What criteria is Used for Social Security and for the Government officials?  Because it sure does seem - DIFFERENT Criteria must be used for the People to be Getting Screwed and the Government elected officials getting the Cake and eating it too!

Portions:

The cost-of-living adjustments, or COLAs, are automatically set each year by an inflation measure that was adopted by Congress back in the 1970s. Based on inflation so far this year, the trustees who oversee Social Security project there will be no COLA for 2011. 

The projection will be made official on Friday, when the Bureau of Labor Statistics releases inflation estimates for September. The timing couldn't be worse for Democrats as they approach an election in which they are in danger of losing their House majority, and possibly their Senate majority as well.

"While people aren't getting COLAs they certainly feel like they're falling further and further behind, particularly in this economy," said David Certner, AARP's legislative policy director. "People are very reliant on Social Security as a major portion of their income and, quite frankly, they have counted on the COLA over the years.

As I see it, We have a MAJOR Problem Come Friday Oct. 1st! Why? Because the U.S. fiscal year ends Sept. 30th - BUT Congress NEVER Set a Fiscal Budget for 2011..... Why hasn't the media mentioned this?!

I have posted previously about the U.S. government NOT even discussing or setting a Fiscal Budget for 2011.  They should have done this by April 15th of this year.  Pelosi, NEVER even brought it up for discussion for the Congress!

So, as of Oct. 1st - in one day from now, the U.S. will NOT have a Fiscal Budget for 2011!

I would like to know first what the hell they plan on doing and second, why the Hell hasn't the MSM even mentioned this HUGE Fact? Correction - Fox News did mention there is NO Budget for 2011, last week.
CBS also did an article about it, last June.


The U.S. by constitution has to set a Budget for the United States, yet this year for the FIRST TIME EVER, Congress has ignored this very important Fiscal responsibility for the citizens of the U.S.

I guess they think no one would notice there is NO budget set.

So does that mean they can SPEND AND TAX as they want?  Does that mean they have NO RESPONSIBILITY to the People of the United States?

What will happen come October 1st?  Will they then just pass one multi billion dollar bill after another to pay for their wars and salaries?

People need to understand, this government now is completely UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

With a government not doing their constitutional responsibility for their citizens, how is it they can keep passing bills and those be legal?  Will they pass bills to pay for their own salaries and make sure those are covered?

OH, one small thing about that.  The government did not raise social security for the increase of living expenses, as they said there was no increase of living cost.  BUT Congress and the Senate RAISED Their Salaries this year due to Living cost increases!  So, here is another question...............................   What data did they use for their salaries and what data did they use for the public's?   A social security rate increase is NOT Good enough for the People, yet it IS Good enough for their salaries?

We NEED TO DEMAND FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY AND A FISCAL BUDGET FOR 2011 !!  It is a Little late for that..... But better late than never!

What has happened to this government and people demanding their elected officials who get paid by the U.S. citizens tax money, become responsible to the citizens and start do their Constitutional Job!?

I am starting to think the 10% overnight devaluation of the dollar may be true.  The government will have many bills come due, come Oct. 1st.

EDIT - 9/30/10 - Drudge has a Huge Headline Across their Front Page - "They Couldn't Even Pass a Budget"!    So, The information is going to Get out today, I hope some MSM outlets pick it up.  People will become aware for the First Time our Government Did NOT PASS A FISCAL BUDGET!  They will pass One Spending Bill after another, it seems.